Chung v. City and County of San Francisco et al
Filing
33
ORDER OF DISMISSAL, ***Civil Case Terminated. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 5/27/11. (nah, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/31/2011)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
DALE CHUNG,
8
9
Plaintiff(s),
v.
No. C 10-1099 PJH
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
10
11
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO,
et al.,
12
Defendant(s).
___________________________________/
13
14
The parties hereto, by their counsel, having advised the court that they have agreed
15
to a settlement of this cause, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this cause of action is
16
dismissed without prejudice; provided, however that if any party hereto shall certify to this
17
court, within sixty (60) days, with proof of service thereof, that the agreed consideration for
18
said settlement has not been delivered over, the foregoing order shall stand vacated and
19
this cause shall forthwith be restored to the calendar to be set for trial.
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
If no certification is filed, after passage of sixty (60) days, the dismissal shall be with
prejudice.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: May 27, 2011
______________________________
PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?