Caldwell v. Paramount Recovery Services

Filing 10

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 9 Stipulation and Proposed Order selecting Mediation signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton(vlk, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/25/2010)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CYNTHIA CALDWELL, ILED Plaintiff(s), v. PARAMOUNT RECOVERY SERVICES STIPULATION AND- [ I ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5: The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process: Court Processes: Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4) Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5) J Mediation (ADR L.R. 6 ) (note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form of ADR, must participate in an ADR phone conference and may notfile thisform. They must insteadfile a Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5) Private Process: Private ADR (please identzfiprocess andprovider) The parties agree to hold the ADR session by: the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order J referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered.) other requested deadline IS/Rvan Lee Attorney for Plaintiff IS/Andrew Steinheimer Attorney for Defendant When filing this document in ECF, please be sure to use the appropriate ADR Docket Event, e.g., "Stipulation and Proposed Order Selecting Early Neutral Evaluation." I I [PROPOSED] ORDER Pursuant to the Stipulation above, the captioned matter is hereby referred to: Non-binding Arbitration Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) J Mediation Private ADR Deadline for ADR session 90 days from the date of this order. other J IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated:

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?