De Los Santos et al v. Panda Express, Inc. et al

Filing 29

ORDER by Judge ARMSTRONG denying 16 Motion to Stay (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/10/2010)

Download PDF
De Los Santos et al v. Panda Express, Inc. et al Doc. 29 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION Case No: C 10-1370 SBA ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO STAY DISCOVERY 8 ANGELICA DE LOS SANTOS; LUCIA SALAZAR; DASHA BAYS; individually, and 9 on behalf of other members of the general public similarly situated, 10 Plaintiffs, 11 vs. 12 PANDA EXPRESS, INC., a California 13 corporation; PANDA RESTAURANT GROUP, INC., a California corporation, and DOES 1 14 through 10, inclusive, 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Defendants. Plaintiffs Angelica De Los Santos, Lucia Salazar and Dasha Bays (collectively "Plaintiffs") are current and former employees of Defendants Panda Express, Inc., and Panda Restaurant Group (collectively "Defendants"), which allegedly engage in discriminatory employment practices against non-Asians. Defendants have filed a motion to dismiss or strike, which is set for hearing on December 7, 2010. Dkt. 13. The parties are presently before the Court on Defendants' motion to stay discovery pending resolution for their motion to dismiss. Dkt. 16. Defendants argue that if their motion to dismiss is granted, there will be no need to conduct discovery. However, such rationale could be made in every case in which a motion to dismiss has been filed. As such, the Court finds that Defendants' justification for a stay of discovery to be unpersuasive. To the extent that Defendants contend that Plaintiffs' discovery requests are unduly burdensome, Defendants Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 may present their concerns to the assigned discovery magistrate judge in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT Defendants' motion to stay discovery is DENIED. This Order terminates Docket 16. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: November 9, 2010 _______________________________ SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG United States District Judge -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?