Dragovich et al v. United States Department of the Treasury et al

Filing 198

ORDER by Judge Claudia Wilken Granting 197 Stipulation Regarding Plaintiffs' Motion for Reasonable Attorneys' Fees, Costs, and Expenses. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/28/2015)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 William C. McNeill, III, State Bar No. 64392 Elizabeth Kristen, State Bar No. 218227 LEGAL AID SOCIETYEMPLOYMENT LAW CENTER 180 Montgomery Street, Suite 600 San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: (415) 864-8848 Facsimile: (415) 593-0096 Email: wmcneill@las-elc.org ekristen@las-elc.org Daniel S. Mason, State Bar No. 54065 Patrick Clayton, State Bar No. 240191 ZELLE HOFMANN VOELBEL & MASON LLP 44 Montgomery Street, Suite 3400 San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: (415) 693-0700 Facsimile: (415) 693-0770 Email: pclayton@zelle.com 11 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 13 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA (OAKLAND DIVISION) 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 MICHAEL DRAGOVICH, MICHAEL Case No. 4:10-cv-01564-CW GAITLEY, ELIZABETH LITTERAL, PATRICIA FITZSIMMONS, CAROLYN LIGHT, CHERYL LIGHT, DAVID BEERS, CHARLES COLE, RAFAEL V. DOMINGUEZ, Assigned to the Hon. Claudia Wilken and JOSE G. HERMOSILLO, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, TIMOTHY GEITHNER, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Treasury, United States Department of the Treasury, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, DOUGLAS SHULMAN, in his official capacity as Commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service, BOARD OF ADMINISTRATION OF CALIFORNIA PUBLIC EMPLOYEES’ RETIREMENT SYSTEM, and ANNE STAUSBOLL, in her official capacity as Chief Executive Officer, CalPERS, JOINT STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR REASONABLE ATTORNEYS’ FEES, COSTS AND EXPENSES Defendants. 28 29 30 31 4:10-cv-01564-CW Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Re Plaintiffs’ Motion for Reasonable Attorneys’ Fees 1 WHEREAS, on December 12, 2014, Plaintiffs filed a Joint Stipulation and 2 Proposed Order are seeking additional time within which to file their motion for 3 reasonable attorneys’ fees, costs and expenses and setting a briefing schedule; 4 5 WHEREAS, on December 15, 2014, this Court entered an order granting Plaintiffs additional time and setting a briefing schedule; 6 WHEREAS, Plaintiffs’ opening brief is due January 30, 2015; 7 WHEREAS, on January 19, 2015, Plaintiffs’ counsel emailed Defendants’ 8 9 counsel asking to meet and confer pursuant to Local Rule 54-5(a); WHEREAS, on January 22, 2015, counsel for Plaintiffs, the federal Defendants 10 and the state Defendants met and conferred telephonically. During this productive phone 11 call, the parties agreed to further discuss Plaintiffs’ attorneys’ fees, costs and expenses 12 once Plaintiffs’ counsel could provide a more detailed breakdown of fees, costs and 13 expenses to Defendants; 14 15 16 WHEREAS, both counsel for federal and state Defendants indicated that they would stipulate to more time for Plaintiffs’ motion should Plaintiffs request more time; WHEREAS, Plaintiffs’ counsel has been working diligently on the motion for 17 reasonable attorneys’ fees, costs and expenses but due to the press of other litigation 18 matters (including an appellate fee reply in Ollier v. Sweetwater, Case No. 12-56348 (due 19 February 23, 2015)), the complicated nature of the motion, the time required to review 20 and categorize time spent (more than 2000 hours) by two organizations regarding three 21 defendants and claims of same-sex plaintiffs and domestic partner plaintiffs over five 22 years, and the possibility of further productive meet and confer sessions with the federal 23 and state Defendants that could narrow the issues in dispute in the motion, Plaintiffs’ 24 counsel is seeking to modify the briefing schedule to afford Plaintiffs’ counsel additional 25 time to file the motion for reasonable attorneys’ fees, costs and expenses; 26 WHEREAS, all parties have agreed to a stipulated briefing schedule; 27 THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED AS FOLLOWS: 28 29 30 31 1 4:10-cv-01564-CW Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Re Plaintiff’s Motion for Reasonable Attorneys’ Fees 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Plaintiffs’ motion for reasonable attorneys’ fees, costs and expenses will be filed on or before March 12, 2015. Defendants’ opposition to Plaintiffs’ motion for reasonable attorneys’ fees, costs and expenses will be filed on or before April 27, 2015. Plaintiffs’ reply in support of their motion for reasonable attorneys’ fees, costs and expenses will be filed on or before May 21, 2015. The hearing on Plaintiffs’ motion for reasonable attorneys’ fees, costs and expenses will be on June 11, 2015 at 2:00 p.m. 9 10 So stipulated, THE LEGAL AID SOCIETY – EMPLOYMENT LAW CENTER 11 12 13 Dated: January 26, 2015 14 BOARD OF ADMINISTRATION OF CALIFORNIA PUBLIC EMPLOYEES’ RETIREMENT SYSTEM, and ANNE STAUSBOLL 15 16 17 18 Dated: January 26, 2015 19 20 By: /S/ Jennifer Morrow Jennifer Morrow, Counsel for Defendants CalPERS and Stausboll U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE CIVIL DIVISION 21 22 By: /S/ Elizabeth Kristen Elizabeth Kristen Dated: January 26, 2015 23 24 By: /S/ Jean Lin Jean Lin, Counsel for Federal Defendants BIPARTISAN LEGAL ADVISORY GROUP OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 25 26 27 28 Dated: January 26, 2015 By: /S/ Kerry W. Kircher Kerry W. Kircher, Counsel for Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group 29 30 31 2 4:10-cv-01564-CW Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Re Plaintiff’s Motion for Reasonable Attorneys’ Fees 1 2 GENERAL ORDER 45 ATTESTATION In accordance with General Order 45, concurrence in the filing of this document has been 3 obtained from each of the signatories, and I shall maintain records to support this concurrence 4 for subsequent production for the court if so ordered or for inspection upon request by a party. 5 /S/ Elizabeth Kristen Elizabeth Kristen 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 3 4:10-cv-01564-CW Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Re Plaintiff’s Motion for Reasonable Attorneys’ Fees ORDER 1 2 It is so ordered. 3 4 5 6 1/28/2015 Dated UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 4 4:10-cv-01564-CW Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Re Plaintiff’s Motion for Reasonable Attorneys’ Fees

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?