Dragovich et al v. United States Department of the Treasury et al
Filing
198
ORDER by Judge Claudia Wilken Granting 197 Stipulation Regarding Plaintiffs' Motion for Reasonable Attorneys' Fees, Costs, and Expenses. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/28/2015)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
William C. McNeill, III, State Bar No. 64392
Elizabeth Kristen, State Bar No. 218227
LEGAL AID SOCIETYEMPLOYMENT LAW CENTER
180 Montgomery Street, Suite 600
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone: (415) 864-8848
Facsimile: (415) 593-0096
Email: wmcneill@las-elc.org
ekristen@las-elc.org
Daniel S. Mason, State Bar No. 54065
Patrick Clayton, State Bar No. 240191
ZELLE HOFMANN VOELBEL & MASON LLP
44 Montgomery Street, Suite 3400
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone: (415) 693-0700
Facsimile: (415) 693-0770
Email: pclayton@zelle.com
11
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
12
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
13
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA (OAKLAND DIVISION)
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
MICHAEL DRAGOVICH, MICHAEL
Case No. 4:10-cv-01564-CW
GAITLEY, ELIZABETH LITTERAL,
PATRICIA FITZSIMMONS, CAROLYN
LIGHT, CHERYL LIGHT, DAVID BEERS,
CHARLES COLE, RAFAEL V. DOMINGUEZ,
Assigned to the Hon. Claudia Wilken
and JOSE G. HERMOSILLO, on behalf of
themselves and all others similarly situated,
Plaintiffs,
v.
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE
TREASURY, TIMOTHY GEITHNER, in his
official capacity as Secretary of the Treasury,
United States Department of the Treasury,
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, DOUGLAS
SHULMAN, in his official capacity as
Commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service,
BOARD OF ADMINISTRATION OF
CALIFORNIA PUBLIC EMPLOYEES’
RETIREMENT SYSTEM, and ANNE
STAUSBOLL, in her official capacity as Chief
Executive Officer, CalPERS,
JOINT STIPULATION AND PROPOSED
ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFFS’
MOTION FOR REASONABLE
ATTORNEYS’ FEES, COSTS
AND EXPENSES
Defendants.
28
29
30
31
4:10-cv-01564-CW
Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Re Plaintiffs’ Motion for Reasonable Attorneys’ Fees
1
WHEREAS, on December 12, 2014, Plaintiffs filed a Joint Stipulation and
2
Proposed Order are seeking additional time within which to file their motion for
3
reasonable attorneys’ fees, costs and expenses and setting a briefing schedule;
4
5
WHEREAS, on December 15, 2014, this Court entered an order granting
Plaintiffs additional time and setting a briefing schedule;
6
WHEREAS, Plaintiffs’ opening brief is due January 30, 2015;
7
WHEREAS, on January 19, 2015, Plaintiffs’ counsel emailed Defendants’
8
9
counsel asking to meet and confer pursuant to Local Rule 54-5(a);
WHEREAS, on January 22, 2015, counsel for Plaintiffs, the federal Defendants
10
and the state Defendants met and conferred telephonically. During this productive phone
11
call, the parties agreed to further discuss Plaintiffs’ attorneys’ fees, costs and expenses
12
once Plaintiffs’ counsel could provide a more detailed breakdown of fees, costs and
13
expenses to Defendants;
14
15
16
WHEREAS, both counsel for federal and state Defendants indicated that they
would stipulate to more time for Plaintiffs’ motion should Plaintiffs request more time;
WHEREAS, Plaintiffs’ counsel has been working diligently on the motion for
17
reasonable attorneys’ fees, costs and expenses but due to the press of other litigation
18
matters (including an appellate fee reply in Ollier v. Sweetwater, Case No. 12-56348 (due
19
February 23, 2015)), the complicated nature of the motion, the time required to review
20
and categorize time spent (more than 2000 hours) by two organizations regarding three
21
defendants and claims of same-sex plaintiffs and domestic partner plaintiffs over five
22
years, and the possibility of further productive meet and confer sessions with the federal
23
and state Defendants that could narrow the issues in dispute in the motion, Plaintiffs’
24
counsel is seeking to modify the briefing schedule to afford Plaintiffs’ counsel additional
25
time to file the motion for reasonable attorneys’ fees, costs and expenses;
26
WHEREAS, all parties have agreed to a stipulated briefing schedule;
27
THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED AS FOLLOWS:
28
29
30
31
1
4:10-cv-01564-CW
Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Re Plaintiff’s Motion for Reasonable Attorneys’ Fees
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Plaintiffs’ motion for reasonable attorneys’ fees, costs and expenses will be filed
on or before March 12, 2015.
Defendants’ opposition to Plaintiffs’ motion for reasonable attorneys’ fees, costs
and expenses will be filed on or before April 27, 2015.
Plaintiffs’ reply in support of their motion for reasonable attorneys’ fees, costs
and expenses will be filed on or before May 21, 2015.
The hearing on Plaintiffs’ motion for reasonable attorneys’ fees, costs and
expenses will be on June 11, 2015 at 2:00 p.m.
9
10
So stipulated,
THE LEGAL AID SOCIETY –
EMPLOYMENT LAW CENTER
11
12
13
Dated: January 26, 2015
14
BOARD OF ADMINISTRATION OF
CALIFORNIA PUBLIC EMPLOYEES’
RETIREMENT SYSTEM, and ANNE
STAUSBOLL
15
16
17
18
Dated: January 26, 2015
19
20
By: /S/ Jennifer Morrow
Jennifer Morrow, Counsel for Defendants CalPERS
and Stausboll
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
CIVIL DIVISION
21
22
By: /S/ Elizabeth Kristen
Elizabeth Kristen
Dated: January 26, 2015
23
24
By: /S/ Jean Lin
Jean Lin, Counsel for Federal Defendants
BIPARTISAN LEGAL ADVISORY GROUP
OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
25
26
27
28
Dated: January 26, 2015
By: /S/ Kerry W. Kircher
Kerry W. Kircher, Counsel for
Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group
29
30
31
2
4:10-cv-01564-CW
Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Re Plaintiff’s Motion for Reasonable Attorneys’ Fees
1
2
GENERAL ORDER 45 ATTESTATION
In accordance with General Order 45, concurrence in the filing of this document has been
3
obtained from each of the signatories, and I shall maintain records to support this concurrence
4
for subsequent production for the court if so ordered or for inspection upon request by a party.
5
/S/ Elizabeth Kristen
Elizabeth Kristen
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
3
4:10-cv-01564-CW
Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Re Plaintiff’s Motion for Reasonable Attorneys’ Fees
ORDER
1
2
It is so ordered.
3
4
5
6
1/28/2015
Dated
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
4
4:10-cv-01564-CW
Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Re Plaintiff’s Motion for Reasonable Attorneys’ Fees
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?