Fernando et al v. eBay, Inc. et al
Filing
90
ORDER by Judge ARMSTRONG denying AS MOOT (73) Motion for Extension of Time to File in case 4:10-cv-01668-SBA; denying AS MOOT (92) Stipulation in case 4:10-cv-02500-SBA (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/28/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
OAKLAND DIVISION
9
MOISES ZEPEDA, MICHAEL SPEAR,
Case No: C 10-2500 SBA
10 RONYA OSMAN, BRIAN PATTEE,
CASEY CHING, DENAE ZAMORA,
ORDER
11 MICHAEL LAVANGA, and GARY
MILLER, on behalf of themselves and all
Dkt. 92
12 others similarly situated,
13
14
Plaintiffs,
v.
15 PAYPAL, INC., E-BAY INC., and DOES 1
16
through 10, inclusive,
Defendants.
17
18
DEVINDA FERNANDO, VADIM TSIGEL,
Case No: C 10-1668 SBA
19 MICHAIL ZINGER, AMY RICKEL, FRED
RICKEL, IRA GILMAN, LACY
ORDER
20 REINTSMA, and SHAUL BEHR on behalf of
themselves and all others similarly situated
21 and on behalf of the general public of the
United States
22
Plaintiffs,
23
v.
24
PAYPAL, INC., a Delaware Corporation,
25
Defendant.
26
27
28
Dkt. 73
1
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the parties’ Stipulation Re Revised Briefing
2
Schedule and Hearing Date in Connection with the Motion for Preliminary Approval of
3
Settlement is DENIED as moot. This Order terminates Docket 92 in Case No. C 10-2500
4
SBA and Docket 73 in Case No. C 10-1668 SBA.
5
6
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: January 27, 2013
______________________________
SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG
United States District Judge
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?