Brooks v. Gomez et al
Filing
45
ORDER STAYING CASE, Motions terminated: 30 MOTION to Amend/Correct 29 MOTION to Dismiss MOTION to Amend/Correct 29 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Advisory Financial Consultants, Inc., Ruthe Gomez, 28 MOTION to Dismiss Second Amended Complaint filed by Legent Clearing, LLC.. Replies due by 8/25/2011.. Signed by Judge ARMSTRONG on 8/4/11. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/4/2011)
1
2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
3
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
4
OAKLAND DIVISION
5
6 ELLEN BROOKS,
Plaintiff,
7
8
vs.
Case No: C 10-1873 SBA
ORDER
Dkt. 28, 30, 43
9 RUTH GOMEZ, et al.,
10
Defendants.
11
12
Pursuant to the Stipulation to Stay Proceedings Ninety Days, Docket 43,
13
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT that this action is stayed for ninety (90) days and
14
the motions to dismiss currently pending before the Court, Dockets 28 & 30, are deemed
15
withdrawn without prejudice to refiling the motions within thirty (30) days after the date
16
that the stay is lifted. This Order terminates Docket Nos. 28 and 30.
17
A Case Management Conference is scheduled for November 2, 2011 at 2:30 p.m.
18
Prior to the date scheduled for the conference, the parties shall meet and confer and prepare
19
a joint Case Management Conference Statement. Plaintiff is responsible for filing the joint
20
statement no less than seven (7) days prior to the conference date. The joint statement shall
21
comply with the Standing Order for All Judges of the Northern District of California and
22
the Standing Orders of this Court. Plaintiff is responsible for setting up the conference call.
23
On the specified date and time for the Case Management Conference, Plaintiff shall call
24
(510) 637-3559 with all parties on the line.
25
IT IS SO ORDERED.
26
27
28
Dated: August 4, 2011
_____________________________
SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?