Brooks v. Gomez et al

Filing 70

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 68 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER: That Defendants shall file their Answer to the Plaintiffs Third Amended Complaint by March 20, 2013 filed by Advisory Financial Consultants, Inc., Ellen Brooks. Signed by Judge ARMSTRONG on 3/15/13. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/15/2013)

Download PDF
Case4:10-cv-01873-SBA Document68 Filed03/14/13 Page1 of 1 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – OAKLAND DIVISION 3 4 ELLEN BROOKS, Case No. C10-01873 SBA 5 Plaintiff, 6 7 xxxxxxxxx STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER vs. 8 RUTHE GOMEZ, an individual, ADVISORY FINANCIAL 9 CONSULTANTS, INC. a Corporation, TRADERIGHT SECURITIES, INC. a 10 Corporation, and DOES 1 THROUGH 20. 11 Defendants. 12 13 14 Plaintiff Ellen Brooks (“Brooks”) and Defendants Ruthe Gomez (“Gomez”) and Advisory 15 Financial Consultants, Inc. (“AFC,” collectively “Defendants”) hereby stipulate that Defendants 16 shall file their Answer to the Plaintiffs’ Third Amended Complaint by March 20, 2013. 17 18 Dated: March 14, 2013 LAW OFFICES OF MARK VENARDI 19 /s/Mark L. Venardi Mark L. Venardi, Esq. Attorney for Plaintiff 20 21 22 Dated: March 14, 2013 BALDWIN LAW GROUP 23 /s/Christopher Mader Christopher Mader, Esq. Attorney for Defendants 24 25 IT IS SO ORDERED. 26 3/15/13 Date: _______________ 27 ___________________________________ Honorable Saundra Brown Armstrong 28 1 STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER CASE NO. C10-01873 SBA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?