Brooks v. Gomez et al
Filing
70
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 68 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER: That Defendants shall file their Answer to the Plaintiffs Third Amended Complaint by March 20, 2013 filed by Advisory Financial Consultants, Inc., Ellen Brooks. Signed by Judge ARMSTRONG on 3/15/13. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/15/2013)
Case4:10-cv-01873-SBA Document68 Filed03/14/13 Page1 of 1
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – OAKLAND DIVISION
3
4
ELLEN BROOKS,
Case No. C10-01873 SBA
5
Plaintiff,
6
7
xxxxxxxxx
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER
vs.
8 RUTHE GOMEZ, an individual,
ADVISORY FINANCIAL
9 CONSULTANTS, INC. a Corporation,
TRADERIGHT SECURITIES, INC. a
10
Corporation, and DOES 1 THROUGH 20.
11
Defendants.
12
13
14
Plaintiff Ellen Brooks (“Brooks”) and Defendants Ruthe Gomez (“Gomez”) and Advisory
15 Financial Consultants, Inc. (“AFC,” collectively “Defendants”) hereby stipulate that Defendants
16 shall file their Answer to the Plaintiffs’ Third Amended Complaint by March 20, 2013.
17
18 Dated: March 14, 2013
LAW OFFICES OF MARK VENARDI
19
/s/Mark L. Venardi
Mark L. Venardi, Esq.
Attorney for Plaintiff
20
21
22 Dated: March 14, 2013
BALDWIN LAW GROUP
23
/s/Christopher Mader
Christopher Mader, Esq.
Attorney for Defendants
24
25 IT IS SO ORDERED.
26
3/15/13
Date: _______________
27
___________________________________
Honorable Saundra Brown Armstrong
28
1
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER
CASE NO. C10-01873 SBA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?