Brooks v. Gomez et al

Filing 70

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 68 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER: That Defendants shall file their Answer to the Plaintiffs Third Amended Complaint by March 20, 2013 filed by Advisory Financial Consultants, Inc., Ellen Brooks. Signed by Judge ARMSTRONG on 3/15/13. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/15/2013)

Case4:10-cv-01873-SBA Document68 Filed03/14/13 Page1 of 1

1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – OAKLAND DIVISION

3
4

ELLEN BROOKS,

Case No. C10-01873 SBA

5
Plaintiff,

6
7

xxxxxxxxx
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER

vs.

8 RUTHE GOMEZ, an individual,
ADVISORY FINANCIAL
9 CONSULTANTS, INC. a Corporation,
TRADERIGHT SECURITIES, INC. a
10
Corporation, and DOES 1 THROUGH 20.
11
Defendants.
12
13
14

Plaintiff Ellen Brooks (“Brooks”) and Defendants Ruthe Gomez (“Gomez”) and Advisory

15 Financial Consultants, Inc. (“AFC,” collectively “Defendants”) hereby stipulate that Defendants
16 shall file their Answer to the Plaintiffs’ Third Amended Complaint by March 20, 2013.
17
18 Dated: March 14, 2013

LAW OFFICES OF MARK VENARDI

19

/s/Mark L. Venardi
Mark L. Venardi, Esq.
Attorney for Plaintiff

20
21
22 Dated: March 14, 2013

BALDWIN LAW GROUP

23

/s/Christopher Mader
Christopher Mader, Esq.
Attorney for Defendants

24
25 IT IS SO ORDERED.
26

3/15/13
Date: _______________

27

___________________________________
Honorable Saundra Brown Armstrong

28
1
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER

CASE NO. C10-01873 SBA