Brooks v. Gomez et al

Filing 73

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 72 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER filed by Advisory Financial Consultants, Inc.. Signed by Judge ARMSTRONG on 3/21/13. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/21/2013)

Download PDF
Case4:10-cv-01873-SBA Document72 Filed03/20/13 Page1 of 1 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – OAKLAND DIVISION 3 4 ELLEN BROOKS, Case No. C10-01873 SBA 5 Plaintiff, 6 7 STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER vs. 8 RUTHE GOMEZ, an individual, ADVISORY FINANCIAL 9 CONSULTANTS, INC. a Corporation, TRADERIGHT SECURITIES, INC. a 10 Corporation, and DOES 1 THROUGH 20. 11 Defendants. 12 13 14 Plaintiff Ellen Brooks (“Brooks”) and Defendants Ruthe Gomez and Advisory Financial 15 Consultants, Inc. (collectively “Defendants”) hereby stipulate that Defendants shall file their 16 Answer to the Plaintiffs’ Third Amended Complaint by March 25, 2013. 17 18 Dated: March 20, 2013 LAW OFFICES OF MARK VENARDI 19 /s/Mark L. Venardi Mark L. Venardi, Esq. Attorney for Plaintiff 20 21 22 Dated: March 20, 2013 BALDWIN LAW GROUP 23 /s/Christopher Mader Christopher Mader, Esq. Attorney for Defendants 24 25 IT IS SO ORDERED. 26 Date: _______________ 3/21/13 27 ___________________________________ Honorable Saundra Brown Armstrong 28 1 STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER CASE NO. C10-01873 SBA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?