Capitol Indemnity Corporation et al v. Morris & Associates Insurance Services, Inc. et al

Filing 27

STIPULATION AND ORDER DISMISSING CASE Signed by Judge ARMSTRONG on 2/10/12. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/10/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 Christian J. Gascou, Esq. (Bar No. 209957) GASCOU HOPKINS LLP 1801 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 230 Los Angeles, California 90067 Telephone: (310) 785-9116 Facsimile: (310) 785-9149 Attorneys for Plaintiffs, CAPITOL INDEMNITY CORPORATION and PLATTE RIVER INSURANCE COMPANY 7 THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 OAKLAND DIVISION 10 11 CAPITOL INDEMNITY CORPORATION, ) a Wisconsin corporation; PLATTE RIVER ) ) 12 INSURANCE COMPANY, a Nebraska ) corporation ) 13 ) Plaintiff, ) 14 ) vs. ) 15 MORRIS & ASSOCIATES INSURANCE ) 16 SERVICES, INC., a California Corporation; ) THOMAS HENRY MORRIS an individual ) ) 17 and DOES 1-10, ) ) 18 Defendants. ) 19 CASE NO. C10-01892 SBA STIPULATION TO DISMISSAL AND ORDER 20 TO THE CLERK OF THIS COURT AND TO ALL PARTIES OF RECORD: 21 Having reached a settlement of the Plaintiffs' claims in this case pursuant to the 22 Settlement Agreement attached as Exhibit A, the parties hereby jointly stipulate to dismissal of 23 Plaintiffs claims in this action pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41 (a)(1)(ii). The 24 parties stipulate that this dismissal shall be with prejudice. Each party will bear its own costs 25 and expenses. 26 27 28 -1STIPULATION TO DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 1 Respectfully submitted, 2 3 4 5 The Plaintiffs: DATED: GASCOU HOPKINS LLP BY:_________________________ Christian J. Gascou 6 7 Attorneys for Capitol Indemnity Corporation and Platte River Insurance Company 8 9 10 11 The Defendants: 12 DATED: 13 HINSHAW & CULBERTSON LLP 14 15 16 17 18 BY:_________________________ Bradley M. Zamczyk Attorneys for MORRIS & ASSOCIATES INSURANCE SERVICES, INC., a California Corporation; and THOMAS HENRY MORRIS 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2STIPULATION TO DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 1 2 ORDER 3 4 5 Having considered the parties' Joint Stipulation of Dismissal pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil 6 Procedure 41(a)(1)(ii), and having considered the Settlement Agreement filed by the parties in 7 this case, and good cause appearing therefore, the Court hereby DISMISSES this action. This 8 dismissal shall be with prejudice. Each party will bear its own costs and expenses. 9 10 IT IS SO ORDERED. 11 12 DATED:2/10/12 ___________________________ Judge of the District Court 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -3STIPULATION TO DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 1 2 I hereby certify that on February 9, 2012, the foregoing STIPULATION TO DISMISSAL 3 AND [PROPOSED] ORDER was filed electronically. Notice of this filling will be sent to all parties 4 by operation of the Court’s electronic filing system. Parties may access this filing through the 5 Court’s system. 6 7 DATED: FEBRUARY 9, 2012 GASCOU HOPKINS LLP 8 /s/ Christian J. Gascou Christian J. Gascou 9 10 Attorney for Capitol Indemnity Corporation and Platte River Insurance Company 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -4CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?