United States of America et al v. North East Medical Services

Filing 69

ORDER by Judge Claudia Wilken Granting 67 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/22/2013)

Download PDF
Case4:10-cv-01904-CW Document67 Filed05/21/13 Page4 of 6 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 CV-10-1904 CW UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING EX Plaintiffs, PARTE MOTION TO EXTEND THE TIME IN WHICH THE STATE OF v. CALIFORNIA MUST FILE ITS RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT’S NORTH EAST MEDICAL SERVICES, ANSWER, DEFENSES AND Defendant. COUNTERCLAIMS TO THE AMENDED COMPLAINT-IN-INTERVENTION 10 11 12 13 14 NORTH EAST MEDICAL SERVICES, Case No. C 12-2895 CW INC., et al., Plaintiff, v. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTHCARE SERVICES, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 19 20 NORTH EAST MEDICAL SERVICES, Case No. C 10-2433 CW INC., Plaintiff, v. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTHCARE SERVICES, et al., 21 Defendants. 22 LA CLINICA DE LA RAZA, INC. Case No. C 10-4605 CW 23 Plaintiff, 24 25 26 27 v. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH CARE SERVICES, et al., Defendants. 28 1 [Proposed] Order (CV-10-1904 CW) Case4:10-cv-01904-CW Document67 Filed05/21/13 Page5 of 6 1 The Court, having considered the State’s ex parte motion to file its response to Defendant’s 2 Answer on July 8, 2013, jointly with the U.S., good cause having been shown, and in compliance 3 with the Court’s request that joint briefing should be filed whenever possible, it is hereby 4 ORDERED that the State shall have up to and including July 8, 2013, to file its joint response to 5 Defendant’s Answer. 6 7 8 9 5/22/2013 Dated: ___________________________ ____________________________________ THE HONORABLE CLAUDIA WILKEN UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 [Proposed] Order (CV-10-1904 CW)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?