United States of America et al v. North East Medical Services
Filing
69
ORDER by Judge Claudia Wilken Granting 67 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/22/2013)
Case4:10-cv-01904-CW Document67 Filed05/21/13 Page4 of 6
1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
CV-10-1904 CW
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al.,
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING EX
Plaintiffs, PARTE MOTION TO EXTEND THE
TIME IN WHICH THE STATE OF
v.
CALIFORNIA MUST FILE ITS
RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT’S
NORTH EAST MEDICAL SERVICES,
ANSWER, DEFENSES AND
Defendant. COUNTERCLAIMS TO THE AMENDED
COMPLAINT-IN-INTERVENTION
10
11
12
13
14
NORTH EAST MEDICAL SERVICES,
Case No. C 12-2895 CW
INC., et al.,
Plaintiff,
v.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF
HEALTHCARE SERVICES, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
17
18
19
20
NORTH EAST MEDICAL SERVICES,
Case No. C 10-2433 CW
INC.,
Plaintiff,
v.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF
HEALTHCARE SERVICES, et al.,
21
Defendants.
22
LA CLINICA DE LA RAZA, INC.
Case No. C 10-4605 CW
23
Plaintiff,
24
25
26
27
v.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF
HEALTH CARE SERVICES, et al.,
Defendants.
28
1
[Proposed] Order (CV-10-1904 CW)
Case4:10-cv-01904-CW Document67 Filed05/21/13 Page5 of 6
1
The Court, having considered the State’s ex parte motion to file its response to Defendant’s
2
Answer on July 8, 2013, jointly with the U.S., good cause having been shown, and in compliance
3
with the Court’s request that joint briefing should be filed whenever possible, it is hereby
4
ORDERED that the State shall have up to and including July 8, 2013, to file its joint response to
5
Defendant’s Answer.
6
7
8
9
5/22/2013
Dated: ___________________________
____________________________________
THE HONORABLE CLAUDIA WILKEN
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
[Proposed] Order (CV-10-1904 CW)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?