Autodesk Inc v. Advantec Consulting Engineers Inc

Filing 16

ORDER re 15 Granting Stipulation TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT ADVANTEC CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPONSE TO COMPLAINT. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 8/26/2010. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/26/2010)

Autodesk Inc v. Advantec Consulting Engineers Inc

Doc. 16

1 William J. Brucker (SBN 152,551) STETINA BRUNDA GARRED & BRUCKER 2 75 Enterprise, Suite 250 3 Aliso Viejo, CA 92656 Email: [e-mail] 4 Tel: [phone] Fax: [phone] Attorneys for Defendant ADVANTEC CONSULTING 7 ENGINEERS, INC. 8 9
%58&.(5

10
HON E: [phone]; FACSIMIL E: [phone] /,62 9,(-2 &$/,)251,$

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION Case No. C10-01918 CW STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT ADVANTEC CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPONSE TO COMPLAINT; [PROPOSED] ORDER [CIVIL L.R. 6-1(a)] NO HEARING REQUIRED

11 12 13

6 7 ( 7 , 1 % 5 8 1 ' $ * $ 5 5 ( ' $

(17(535,6( 68,7(

AUTODESK, INC., a Delaware 14 corporation, 15 16 17 vs. 18 ADVANTEC CONSULTING 19 ENGINEERS, INC., a California corporation 20 Defendant 21 22 23 Plaintiff

$
P

Pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-1(a), plaintiff Autodesk, Inc., by and through counsel,

24 and defendant Advantec Consulting Engineers, Inc., by and through counsel, hereby 25 stipulate that defendant Advantec Consulting Engineers, Inc., shall have up to and 26 including Tuesday, September 7, 2010, to answer or otherwise respond to the 27 Complaint on file herein. The purpose of the extension is to provide the parties with 28
Case No. CW 1 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT ADVANTEC CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPONSE TO COMPLAINT; [PROPOSED] ORDER

Dockets.Justia.com

1 additional time to finalize the settlement agreement, drafts of which are in the process 2 of review and execution. Such an extension will not have any impact on the Case 3 Management Conference or any other scheduled dates set by the Court. 4 5 6 7 8 9
%58&.(5

Dated: August 24, 2010

STETINA BRUNDA GARRED & BRUCKER

10
HON E: [phone]; FACSIMIL E: [phone] /,62 9,(-2 &$/,)251,$ (17(535,6( 68,7(

By: /s/William J. Brucker William J. Brucker Attorneys for Defendant ADVANTEC CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. DONAHUE GALLAGHER WOODS LLP

11 Dated: August 24, 2010 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated:_______________________

6 7 ( 7 , 1 % 5 8 1 ' $ * $ 5 5 ( ' $

By: SEE ATTACHED Julie E. Hofer Attorneys for Plaintiff AUTODESK, INC. ORDER PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. ______________________________________ Hon. Claudia Wilken United States District Court Judge

$
P

T:\Client Documents\ATECC\001L\Stip.Extension.Answer.082410.doc

Case No. CW 2 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT ADVANTEC CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPONSE TO COMPLAINT; [PROPOSED] ORDER

8/26/2010