Paniagua v. County of Alameda et al

Filing 11

ORDER re 10 Granting Stipulation re: Case Management Scheduling Order. Case Management Statement due by 11/23/2010. Initial Case Management Conference set for 11/30/2010 02:00 PM. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 9/27/2010. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/27/2010)

Paniagua v. County of Alameda et al

Doc. 11

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

RICHARD E. WINNIE [68048] County Counsel By: TODD A. BOLEY [68119] Deputy County Counsel Office of County Counsel, County of Alameda 1221 Oak Street, Suite 450 Oakland, California 94612 Telephone: [phone] Attorneys for Defendants County of Alameda, Karen Benjamin and Denise Smith

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA (OAKLAND DIVISION)

DEBRA PANIAGUA, Plaintiff, v. COUNTY OF ALAMEDA; CELESTE DRUMMOND, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS AN EMPLOYEE OF COUNTY OF ALAMEDA; MELISSA TURNER, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS AN EMPLOYEE OF COUNTY OF ALAMEDA; KAREN BENJAMIN, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS AN EMPLOYEE OF COUNTY OF ALAMEDA; DENISE SMITH, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS AN EMPLOYEE OF COUNTY OF ALAMEDA and DOES 1-20 inclusive, Defendants.

Case No.: C10-01981-CW

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT

IT IS HEREBY STIPUTLATED BY AND BETWEEN THE PARTIES HERETO THAT: 1. 7, 2010. 2. The Court issued a Scheduling Order on September 8, 2010 setting the This matter was assigned to the Honorable Claudia Wilken on September

Case Management Conference for October 5, 2010. At that time, none of the
STIPULATION and [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING CMC, Paniagua v. COA, et al., Case No. C10-01981-CW 1

Dockets.Justia.com

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

defendants had filed responsive pleadings. 3. Defendants County of Alameda, Karen Benjamin and Denise Smith filed a

motion to dismiss the complaint on September 13, 2010. The first available hearing date was October 28, 2010. 4. The ruling on the motion to dismiss will clarify the issues for the parties

and make planning for the Case Management Conference more meaningful. The parties respectfully request that the Case Management Conference be continued to a date after the hearing on the motion to dismiss. DATED: September 24, 2010 RICHARD E. WINNIE, County Counsel in and for the County of Alameda, State of California

_____

/s/ Todd Boley____________ TODD BOLEY Deputy County Counsel

Attorneys for Defendants County of Alameda, Karen Benjamin and Denise Smith DATED: September 24, 2010 LAW OFFICE OF MICHAEL G. DIAS

_____

/s/ Michael G. Dias________ MICHAEL G. DIAS

Attorney for Plaintiff Debra Paniagua I hereby attest that I have consent from all parties to e-file this document with electronic signatures. _____ /s/ Todd Boley________ TODD BOLEY Deputy County Counsel

Attorneys for Defendants County of Alameda, Karen Benjamin and Denise Smith
STIPULATION and [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING CMC, Paniagua v. COA, et al., Case No. C10-01981-CW 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Based on the Stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. That the Case Management Conference be continued to November 30 ________________________, 2010 at 2:00 pm.

Dated: 9/27/2010 HON. CLAUDIA WILKEN United States District Judge

STIPULATION and [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING CMC, Paniagua v. COA, et al., Case No. C10-01981-CW 3