Hawkins et al v. The Franchise Tax Board of California et al
Filing
28
ORDER granting 27 Stipulation to Request Extension of Case Management Conference. Case Management Statement due by 7/2/2015. Case Management Conference set for 7/10/2015 11:00 AM in Courtroom 5, 2nd Floor, Oakland. Signed by Judge JEFFREY S. WHITE on 5/20/15. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/20/2015)
1 HEINZ BINDER, SBN#87908
WENDY W. SMITH, SBN#133887
2 Binder & Malter, LLP
2775 Park Avenue
3 Santa Clara, CA 95050
Phone: (408) 295-1700
4 Fax: (408) 295-1531
Email: heinz@bindermalter.com
5 Email: wendy@bindermalter.com
6
Attorneys for Appellant, William M. Hawkins, III
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
OAKLAND
11
WILLIAM M. HAWKINS, IIII,
12
Appellant,
13
14
v.
15
THE FRANCHISE TAX BOARD,
16 A DIVISION OF THE GOVERNMENT
OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA; et. Al.
17
Appellees.
18
)) Case No.: 10-02026 JSW
)
) Ch. 11 Bankruptcy Case No.: 06-30815 TEC
)
)
Adv. Proc. No.: 07-3139 TEC
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
ORDER ON STIPULATION TO REQUEST EXTENSION OF CASE MANAGEMENT
CONFERENCE
19
20
On the stipulation of the parties, the Court continues the Case Management Conference
21
22
previously set for June 5, 2015 at 11:00 a.m., to July 10, 2015 at 11:00 a.m..
23
May 20, 2015
24 Dated:_________
25
_______________________________
JEFFREY S. WHITE
United States District Judge
26 //
27
28
ORDER ON STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR
APPELLANT TO FILE REPLY BRIEF
1
1 //
2 APPROVED AS TO FORM:
3
Dated: May 13, 2015
4
Department of Justice
Office of the Attorney General
5
6
By:
7
8
/s/ Lucy F. Wang
Lucy F. Wang, Esq.
Attorney for the Franchise Tax
Board of California
9
10
Dated: May 13, 2015
U.S. Department of Justice
Tax Division
11
12
By: /s/ William Carl Hankla
William Carl Hankla
Attorney for United States of
America, Internal Revenue
Service
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ORDER ON STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR
APPELLANT TO FILE REPLY BRIEF
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?