Milano v. Interstate Battery System of America Inc et al
Filing
38
ORDER Granting 37 Stipulation to Vacate Litigation Deadlines. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 4/18/2011. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/18/2011)
1
6
Eric H. Gibbs (State Bar No. 178658)
ehg@girardgibbs.com
Philip B. Obbard (State Bar No. 135372)
David Stein (State Bar No. 257465)
GIRARD GIBBS LLP
601 California Street, 14th Floor
San Francisco, California 94104
Telephone: (415) 981-4800
Facsimile: (415) 981-4846
7
Attorneys for Plaintiff Deno Milano
2
3
4
5
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Robert A. Mittelstaedt (State Bar No. 60359)
ramittelstaedt@jonesday.com
Craig E. Stewart (State Bar No. 129530)
JONES DAY
555 California Street, 26th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone: (415) 626-3939
Facsimile: (415) 875-5700
Attorneys for Defendants Interstate Battery System of
America, Inc., and Interstate Battery System International, Inc.
15
16
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
OAKLAND DIVISION
17
18
19
DENO MILANO,
Case No. C 10–02125 CW
20
21
22
23
Plaintiff,
vs.
STIPULATION TO VACATE LITIGATION
DEADLINES AND ORDER.
INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEM OF
AMERICA, INC.; INTERSTATE BATTERY
SYSTEM INTERNATIONAL, INC.,
24
Defendants.
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO VACATE LITIGATION DEADLINES
CASE NO. C 10–02125 CW
1
Plaintiff Deno Milano and Defendants Interstate Battery System of America, Inc., and Interstate
2
Battery System International, Inc., by and through the undersigned attorneys hereby agree and stipulate
3
as follows:
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
WHEREAS, this Court has twice granted 30-day stays to allow the parties the opportunity to
conduct in-person settlement discussions, (Doc. Nos. 34, 36 (Feb. 15 and Mar. 9, 2011);
WHEREAS, during their most recent mediation session with the Hon. William J. Cahill (Ret.) of
JAMS, on March 31, 2011, the parties reached an agreement in principle to fully resolve this litigation;
WHEREAS, a Case Management Conference and hearing for class certification are currently
scheduled for July 14, 2011, at 2:00 p.m.; and
WHEREAS, the parties are working to memorialize the terms of their agreement in a written
settlement agreement to present to the Court with their motion for preliminary approval.
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and through the undersigned attorneys for
the parties, subject to the Court’s approval, that:
14
1. All litigation deadlines in this case are vacated;
15
2. The July 14, 2011, date for a Case Management Conference and hearing shall be kept on
16
17
18
19
calendar; and
3. The parties will continue to work diligently to finalize their agreement and to file their
motion for preliminary approval of settlement by June 9, 2011.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
20
21
DATED: April 15, 2011
GIRARD GIBBS LLP
22
By:
23
Philip B. Obbard
David Stein
601 California Street, Suite 1400
San Francisco, California 94104
Telephone: (415) 981-4800
Facsimile: (415) 981-4846
24
25
26
27
/s/ Eric H. Gibbs
Attorneys for Plaintiff
28
1
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO VACATE LITIGATION DEADLINES
CASE NO. C 10-02125 CW
1
DATED: April 15, 2011
JONES DAY
2
By:
3
Craig E. Stewart
4
Robert A. Mittelstaedt
555 California Street, 26th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone: (415) 626-3939
Facsimile: (415) 875-5700
5
6
7
Attorneys for Defendants
8
9
10
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS ORDERED:
11
The Court has read and considered the parties’ stipulation and orders that:
12
1.
All pending litigation deadlines are vacated.
13
2.
The parties shall use their best efforts to finalize the settlement agreement and to file a
14
motion for preliminary approval by June 9, 2011.
15
3.
16
17
The Case Management Conference and hearing scheduled for July 14, 2011, shall remain
on calendar for a hearing on the parties’ motion for preliminary approval of settlement.
18
19
20
21
Date:
4/18/2011
Judge Claudia Wilken
United States District Judge
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO VACATE LITIGATION DEADLINES
CASE NO. C 10-02125 CW
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?