Milano v. Interstate Battery System of America Inc et al

Filing 38

ORDER Granting 37 Stipulation to Vacate Litigation Deadlines. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 4/18/2011. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/18/2011)

Download PDF
1 6 Eric H. Gibbs (State Bar No. 178658) ehg@girardgibbs.com Philip B. Obbard (State Bar No. 135372) David Stein (State Bar No. 257465) GIRARD GIBBS LLP 601 California Street, 14th Floor San Francisco, California 94104 Telephone: (415) 981-4800 Facsimile: (415) 981-4846 7 Attorneys for Plaintiff Deno Milano 2 3 4 5 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Robert A. Mittelstaedt (State Bar No. 60359) ramittelstaedt@jonesday.com Craig E. Stewart (State Bar No. 129530) JONES DAY 555 California Street, 26th Floor San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: (415) 626-3939 Facsimile: (415) 875-5700 Attorneys for Defendants Interstate Battery System of America, Inc., and Interstate Battery System International, Inc. 15 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION 17 18 19 DENO MILANO, Case No. C 10–02125 CW 20 21 22 23 Plaintiff, vs. STIPULATION TO VACATE LITIGATION DEADLINES AND ORDER. INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEM OF AMERICA, INC.; INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEM INTERNATIONAL, INC., 24 Defendants. 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND ORDER TO VACATE LITIGATION DEADLINES CASE NO. C 10–02125 CW 1 Plaintiff Deno Milano and Defendants Interstate Battery System of America, Inc., and Interstate 2 Battery System International, Inc., by and through the undersigned attorneys hereby agree and stipulate 3 as follows: 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 WHEREAS, this Court has twice granted 30-day stays to allow the parties the opportunity to conduct in-person settlement discussions, (Doc. Nos. 34, 36 (Feb. 15 and Mar. 9, 2011); WHEREAS, during their most recent mediation session with the Hon. William J. Cahill (Ret.) of JAMS, on March 31, 2011, the parties reached an agreement in principle to fully resolve this litigation; WHEREAS, a Case Management Conference and hearing for class certification are currently scheduled for July 14, 2011, at 2:00 p.m.; and WHEREAS, the parties are working to memorialize the terms of their agreement in a written settlement agreement to present to the Court with their motion for preliminary approval. IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and through the undersigned attorneys for the parties, subject to the Court’s approval, that: 14 1. All litigation deadlines in this case are vacated; 15 2. The July 14, 2011, date for a Case Management Conference and hearing shall be kept on 16 17 18 19 calendar; and 3. The parties will continue to work diligently to finalize their agreement and to file their motion for preliminary approval of settlement by June 9, 2011. IT IS SO STIPULATED. 20 21 DATED: April 15, 2011 GIRARD GIBBS LLP 22 By: 23 Philip B. Obbard David Stein 601 California Street, Suite 1400 San Francisco, California 94104 Telephone: (415) 981-4800 Facsimile: (415) 981-4846 24 25 26 27 /s/ Eric H. Gibbs Attorneys for Plaintiff 28 1 STIPULATION AND ORDER TO VACATE LITIGATION DEADLINES CASE NO. C 10-02125 CW 1 DATED: April 15, 2011 JONES DAY 2 By: 3 Craig E. Stewart 4 Robert A. Mittelstaedt 555 California Street, 26th Floor San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: (415) 626-3939 Facsimile: (415) 875-5700 5 6 7 Attorneys for Defendants 8 9 10 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS ORDERED: 11 The Court has read and considered the parties’ stipulation and orders that: 12 1. All pending litigation deadlines are vacated. 13 2. The parties shall use their best efforts to finalize the settlement agreement and to file a 14 motion for preliminary approval by June 9, 2011. 15 3. 16 17 The Case Management Conference and hearing scheduled for July 14, 2011, shall remain on calendar for a hearing on the parties’ motion for preliminary approval of settlement. 18 19 20 21 Date: 4/18/2011 Judge Claudia Wilken United States District Judge 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 STIPULATION AND ORDER TO VACATE LITIGATION DEADLINES CASE NO. C 10-02125 CW

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?