Hyosung (America), Inc. et al v. Hantle USA, Inc.
Filing
103
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Nandor J. Vadas requiring further briefing re sealing of Answer. (njvlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/1/2011)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
EUREKA DIVISION
8
9
HYOSUNG (AMERICA),INC.
NAUTILUS HYOSUNG, INC.,
and
ORDER REQUIRING FURTHER
BRIEFING
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
No. 10-cv-2160 SBA (NJV)
Plaintiffs,
v.
HANTLE, INC. (fka Hantle USA, Inc.),
GENMEGA, INC. (fka Huin, Inc.), WON GEE
LEE, and MYUNG WON SUH,
Defendants.
___________________________________/
16
17
18
19
20
On May 19, 2011, the Court entered an order granting in part Defendant Won Gee Lee’s
21
miscellaneous administrative request to file his Answer under seal. (Docket No.84.) In that order,
22
the Court granted the motion “to the extent that it seeks to place the Answer under seal on a
23
temporary basis until the Motion for Protective Order filed by Defendants Won Gee Lee, Myung
24
Won Suh, and Hantle, Inc. is decided.” Id. at 2. The Court stated that it would address whether the
25
Answer would remain under seal in its ruling on the motion for a protective order. Id.
26
The Court has entered its order granting in part and denying in part Defendants’ motion for a
27
protective order. (Docket No. 102) The Court finds that further briefing is required regarding the
28
continued sealing of the Answer in light of that order. Accordingly, the parties are HEREBY
1
ORDERED to file a joint letter brief, no long than five page in length, addressing that issue. The
2
letter brief shall be filed no later than July 15, 2011.
3
IT IS SO ORDERED.
4
5
Dated: July 1, 2011
6
7
NANDOR J. VADAS
United States Magistrate Judge
8
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?