Hyosung (America), Inc. et al v. Hantle USA, Inc.

Filing 103

ORDER by Magistrate Judge Nandor J. Vadas requiring further briefing re sealing of Answer. (njvlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/1/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 EUREKA DIVISION 8 9 HYOSUNG (AMERICA),INC. NAUTILUS HYOSUNG, INC., and ORDER REQUIRING FURTHER BRIEFING 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 14 15 No. 10-cv-2160 SBA (NJV) Plaintiffs, v. HANTLE, INC. (fka Hantle USA, Inc.), GENMEGA, INC. (fka Huin, Inc.), WON GEE LEE, and MYUNG WON SUH, Defendants. ___________________________________/ 16 17 18 19 20 On May 19, 2011, the Court entered an order granting in part Defendant Won Gee Lee’s 21 miscellaneous administrative request to file his Answer under seal. (Docket No.84.) In that order, 22 the Court granted the motion “to the extent that it seeks to place the Answer under seal on a 23 temporary basis until the Motion for Protective Order filed by Defendants Won Gee Lee, Myung 24 Won Suh, and Hantle, Inc. is decided.” Id. at 2. The Court stated that it would address whether the 25 Answer would remain under seal in its ruling on the motion for a protective order. Id. 26 The Court has entered its order granting in part and denying in part Defendants’ motion for a 27 protective order. (Docket No. 102) The Court finds that further briefing is required regarding the 28 continued sealing of the Answer in light of that order. Accordingly, the parties are HEREBY 1 ORDERED to file a joint letter brief, no long than five page in length, addressing that issue. The 2 letter brief shall be filed no later than July 15, 2011. 3 IT IS SO ORDERED. 4 5 Dated: July 1, 2011 6 7 NANDOR J. VADAS United States Magistrate Judge 8 9 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?