Hyosung (America), Inc. et al v. Hantle USA, Inc.

Filing 84

ORDER by Judge ARMSTRONG granting in part and denying in part 80 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/19/2011)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

ADAM A. LEWIS (Cal. Bar No. 88736)
([e-mail])
GRANT L. KIM (Cal. Bar No. 114989)
([e-mail])
ALISON M. TUCHER (Cal. Bar No. 171363)
([e-mail])
BARBARA N. BARATH (Cal. Bar No. 268146)
([e-mail])
MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
425 Market Street
San Francisco, California 94105-2482
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
HYOSUNG (AMERICA), INC. and
NAUTILUS HYOSUNG INC.

10
11

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

12

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

13

OAKLAND DIVISION

14
15

HYOSUNG (AMERICA), INC. and NAUTILUS
HYOSUNG INC.,

16
17
18
19
20

Plaintiffs,
v.
HANTLE, INC. (fka Hantle USA, Inc.),
GENMEGA, INC. (fka Huin, Inc.),
WON GEE LEE, and MYUNG WON SUH,

Case No.

CV-10-2160-SBA

ORDER GRANTING IN PART
DEFENDANT WON GEE LEE’S
MISCELLANEOUS
ADMINISTRATIVE REQUEST TO
FILE ANSWER UNDER SEAL
Judge:

Hon. Saundra B. Armstrong

Defendants.

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING IN PART DEFENDANT WON GEE LEE’S MISCELLANEOUS ADMINISTRATIVE
REQUEST TO FILE ANSWER UNDER SEAL — CV-10-2160-SBA
sf-2994992

1
2

Pursuant to Civil L.R. 7-10(b) and 79-5, Defendant Won Gee Lee filed a Miscellaneous

3

Administrative Request for an order permitting him to file under seal his Answer to Plaintiffs’

4

Second Amended Complaint For Avoidance and Recovery of Fraudulent Conveyance and

5

Related Claims.

6
7

Based on the documents filed with the Court in connection with this administrative motion
and the papers and records on file in this action, the Court hereby orders as follows:

8

FOR GOOD CAUSE SHOWN, the Court hereby GRANTS Defendant Won Gee Lee’s

9

Miscellaneous Administrative Request To File Answer Under Seal to the extent that it seeks to

10

place the Answer under seal on a temporary basis until the Motion for Protective Order filed by

11

Defendants Won Gee Lee, Myung Won Suh, and Hantle, Inc. is decided. The Court DENIES

12

Defendant Won Gee Lee’s Miscellaneous Administrative Request to the extent that it seeks to

13

place the Answer under seal on a permanent basis, regardless of the Court’s ruling on the Motion

14

for Protective Order. The Court will address whether the Answer will remain under seal in its

15

ruling on the Motion for Protective Order, which shall supersede this Order.

16
17

IT IS SO ORDERED.

18
19
20

DATED: _____5/19/11

___________________________
JUDGE SAUNDRA B. ARMSTRONG
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING IN PART DEFENDANT WON GEE LEE’S MISCELLANEOUS ADMINISTRATIVE
REQUEST TO FILE ANSWER UNDER SEAL — CV-10-2160-SBA
sf-2994992

1