Hariguchi v. Netlogic Microsystems, Inc. et al

Filing 50

ORDER OF DISMISSAL. Signed by Judge ARMSTRONG on 9/113/11. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/14/2011)

Download PDF
1 STUART C. CLARK (SBN 124152) clark@carrferrell.com 2 CHRISTINE S. WATSON (SBN 218006) cwatson@carrferrell.com 3 CARR & FERRELL LLP 2200 Geng Road 4 Palo Alto, California 94303 Telephone: (650) 812-3400 5 Facsimile: (650) 812-3444 6 Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant YOICHI HARIGUCHI 7 H. MARK LYON (SBN 162061) 8 MLyon@gibsondunn.com STUART M. ROSENBERG (SBN 239926) 9 SRosenberg@gibsondunn.com 10 GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP 1881 Page Mill Road 11 Palo Alto, California 94304 Telephone: (650) 849-5300 12 Facsimile: (650) 849-5333 13 Attorneys for Defendants and Counterclaimants 14 NETLOGIC MICROSYSTEMS, INC., and INTEGRATED DEVICE TECHNOLOGY, INC. 15 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 17 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 18 OAKLAND DIVISION 19 20 YOICHI HARIGUCHI, an individual, Plaintiff, 21 22 Case No. 4:10-cv-02203-SBA v. ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AND WITHOUT FEES OR COSTS 23 NETLOGIC MICROSYSTEMS, INC., a Delaware corporation, and 24 INTEGRATED DEVICE TECHNOLOGY, INC., a Delaware corporation, 25 Defendants. 26 27 AND RELATED CROSS ACTION 28 4:10-cv-02203-SBA -1- [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL 1 The Court, having considered the joint stipulation for dismissal with prejudice filed by 2 Plaintiff Yoichi Hariguchi (“Hariguchi”) and Defendants NetLogic Microsystems, Inc. 3 (“NetLogic”) and Integrated Device Technology, Inc. (“IDT”) pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of 4 the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and for good cause shown, hereby dismisses all claims and 5 counterclaims in this case with prejudice. Each party shall bear its own attorneys’ fees and costs. 6 SO ORDERED 7 DATED: September 13, 2011 8 __ HON. SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4:10-cv-02203-SBA -2- [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?