Hariguchi v. Netlogic Microsystems, Inc. et al
Filing
50
ORDER OF DISMISSAL. Signed by Judge ARMSTRONG on 9/113/11. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/14/2011)
1 STUART C. CLARK (SBN 124152)
clark@carrferrell.com
2 CHRISTINE S. WATSON (SBN 218006)
cwatson@carrferrell.com
3 CARR & FERRELL LLP
2200 Geng Road
4 Palo Alto, California 94303
Telephone: (650) 812-3400
5 Facsimile: (650) 812-3444
6 Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterclaim
Defendant YOICHI HARIGUCHI
7
H. MARK LYON (SBN 162061)
8 MLyon@gibsondunn.com
STUART M. ROSENBERG (SBN 239926)
9
SRosenberg@gibsondunn.com
10 GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP
1881 Page Mill Road
11 Palo Alto, California 94304
Telephone: (650) 849-5300
12 Facsimile: (650) 849-5333
13
Attorneys for Defendants and Counterclaimants
14 NETLOGIC MICROSYSTEMS, INC., and
INTEGRATED DEVICE TECHNOLOGY, INC.
15
16
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
17
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
18
OAKLAND DIVISION
19
20 YOICHI HARIGUCHI, an individual,
Plaintiff,
21
22
Case No. 4:10-cv-02203-SBA
v.
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
WITH PREJUDICE AND
WITHOUT FEES OR COSTS
23 NETLOGIC MICROSYSTEMS, INC., a
Delaware corporation, and
24 INTEGRATED DEVICE TECHNOLOGY,
INC., a Delaware corporation,
25
Defendants.
26
27 AND RELATED CROSS ACTION
28
4:10-cv-02203-SBA
-1-
[PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL
1
The Court, having considered the joint stipulation for dismissal with prejudice filed by
2 Plaintiff Yoichi Hariguchi (“Hariguchi”) and Defendants NetLogic Microsystems, Inc.
3 (“NetLogic”) and Integrated Device Technology, Inc. (“IDT”) pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of
4 the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and for good cause shown, hereby dismisses all claims and
5 counterclaims in this case with prejudice. Each party shall bear its own attorneys’ fees and costs.
6
SO ORDERED
7
DATED: September 13, 2011
8
__
HON. SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4:10-cv-02203-SBA
-2-
[PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?