Inocencio v. Hedgpeth et al
Filing
26
ORDER FOR BRIEFING RE: TIMELINESS OF PETITION. Signed by Judge Hamilton on 4/5/12. (pjhlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/5/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
HENRY PAUL INOCENCIO,
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
Petitioner,
v.
13
ORDER FOR BRIEFING RE
TIMELINESS OF PETITION
ANTHONY HEDGPATH, Warden,
14
No. C 10-2334 PJH
Respondent.
_______________________________/
15
16
Petitioner Henry Paul Inocencio (“Inocencio”), a California prisoner, filed a federal
17
habeas petition on May 27, 2010. On November 8, 2010, the state filed a motion to
18
dismiss Inocencio’s petition as mixed, containing both exhausted and unexhausted claims.
19
Inocencio filed an opposition, the state filed a reply, and the motion was fully briefed on
20
December 6, 2010. On September 27, 2011, the case was reassigned from the Honorable
21
Jeremy Fogel to the undersigned judge, and on September 29, 2011, the court denied the
22
state’s motion to dismiss and set a briefing schedule on the petition.
23
24
25
On November 9, 2011, the state filed its answer. Inocencio’s traverse was due
December 9, 2011, but he failed to file one.
Having reviewed the state’s answer, the court notes that the state now moves to
26
dismiss Inocencio’s petition on timeliness grounds as well, grounds that were not included
27
in the state’s prior motion to dismiss. The court finds it necessary to adjudicate the
28
timeliness issue prior to addressing the merits of Inocencio’s petition, and thus a response
1
from Inocencio is warranted. Accordingly, Inocencio is ORDERED to file a response to the
2
state’s request to dismiss the petition as untimely no later than Friday, April 27, 2012.
3
The state may file a reply no later than Friday, May 11, 2012.
4
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: April 5, 2012
6
________________________________
PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON
United States District Judge
7
8
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?