Osmanik v. Roanoke Companies Group, Inc. et al

Filing 291

ORDER. Signed by Judge Hamilton on 9/16/2011. (pjhlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/16/2011)

1
2
3
4
5
6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

8
9

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10
FIKRETA OSMANKIC,
12
Plaintiff,

No. C 10-2364 PJH

13
v.

ORDER

14
15

ROANOKE COMPANIES GROUP, INC.,
et al.,

16

Defendant.
_______________________________/

17
18

On July 26, 2011, the court granted the motion of defendants Roanoke Companies

19

Group, Inc. n/k/a BRTT, Inc. (“Roanoke”); Home Depot USA, Inc. (“Home Depot”); and

20

Aerofil Technology, Inc. (“Aerofil”) for summary judgment. On August 11, 2011, Roanoke

21

filed a dismissal of its cross-claims against cross-defendant SLR, Inc. On August 12, 2011,

22

the court entered judgment as to defendant Ortec, Inc. (“Ortec”), based on the granting of

23

Ortec’s motion for summary judgment by the court in the Northern District of Georgia prior

24

to the transfer of this action to this district.

25

However, final judgment cannot be entered because this court’s docket indicates

26

that not all claims and parties have been dismissed. Cross-claims filed by Roanoke and by

27

Ortec, Inc. (“Ortec”), remain in the case, as do claims filed by plaintiff against defendant

28

Innovative Chemical Technologies, Inc. (“Innovative”).

1

Accordingly, no later than September 23, 2011, Roanoke and Ortec shall file

2

dismissals of the cross-claims, and Innovative shall file a motion to dismiss the claims

3

asserted against it, or the court will set the case for a mandatory case management

4

conference.

5
6

IT IS SO ORDERED.

7

Dated: September 16, 2011
______________________________
PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON
United States District Judge

8
9

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2