Black et al v. Google Inc.

Filing 29

OBJECTION and MOTION to Strike plaintiffs' 28 "Objection" by Google Inc.. (Kramer, David) (Filed on 8/30/2010) Modified on 8/31/2010 (cp, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
Black et al v. Google Inc. Doc. 29 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 DAVID H. KRAMER, State Bar No. 168452 BART E. VOLKMER, State Bar No. 223732 JACOB T. VELTMAN, State Bar No. 247597 WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI Professional Corporation 650 Page Mill Road Palo Alto, CA 94304-1050 Telephone: (650) 493-9300 Facsimile: (650) 565-5100 dkramer@wsgr.com Attorneys for Defendant Google Inc. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION GARY BLACK, et al., Plaintiffs, v. GOOGLE INC., Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. C 10-02381 CW DEFENDANT GOOGLE INC.'S OBJECTION AND MOTION TO STRIKE PLAINTIFFS' "OBJECTION" DEF. GOOGLE INC.'S OBJECTION & MOTION TO STRIKE CASE NO. C 10-02381 CW Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 · · · · OBJECTION AND MOTION TO STRIKE On August 13, 2010, the Court granted with prejudice defendant Google Inc.'s ("Google") motion to dismiss Plaintiffs' Complaint. (Docket No. 26). On August 25, 2010, Plaintiffs filed a paper entitled "Objection." (Docket No. 28). That nearly incomprehensible document should be stricken because it contains scurrilous allegations and there is no basis in any rule or statute for its filing. Plaintiffs should also be reminded of their duties under Rule 11 and 28 U.S.C. § 1927. Plaintiffs have paid little heed to the Federal Rules or the Local Rules during this litigation: · Plaintiffs filed a free-standing "declaration" on the same day that Google filed its motion to dismiss even though there is no basis for such a filing under the Federal Rules or the Local Rules. (Docket No. 13). Plaintiffs filed a premature motion for judgment on the pleadings before the pleadings were closed in violation of Rule 12(c) and controlling Ninth Circuit authority. (Docket No. 15). Plaintiffs filed serial memoranda responding to Google' motion to dismiss in violation of Civil Local Rule 7-3. (Docket Nos. 15, 16). Plaintiffs filed a "Declaration For Damages," again without any authority, after the briefing was closed on the pleadings motions. (Docket No. 23). After judgment was entered, Plaintiffs filed an "Objection" to the Court's order dismissing their case with prejudice. (Docket No. 28). These actions have caused undue burden and expense and are not excused based on Plaintiffs' pro se status. See United States v. Merrill, 746 F. 2d 458, 465 (9th Cir. 1984) (a pro se litigant "is subject to the same rules of procedure and evidence as defendants who are represented by counsel."). While Google has exercised restraint on these matters, it respectfully requests that the Court warn // // DEF. GOOGLE INC.'S OBJECTION & MOTION TO STRIKE CASE NO. C 10-02381 CW -1- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Plaintiffs that any further unauthorized submissions or baseless personal attacks will result in sanctions. Dated: August 30, 2010 Respectfully submitted, WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI Professional Corporation By: /s/ David H. Kramer David H. Kramer Attorneys for Defendant Google Inc. DEF. GOOGLE INC.'S OBJECTION & MOTION TO STRIKE CASE NO. C 10-02381 CW -2- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE NON-ECF FILERS I, Deborah Grubbs, declare: I am employed in Santa Clara County, State of California. I am over the age of 18 years and not a party to the within action. My business address is Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, 650 Page Mill Road, Palo Alto, California 94304-1050. On this date I served: DEFENDANT GOOGLE INC.'S OBJECTION AND MOTION TO STRIKE PLAINTIFFS' "OBJECTION" VIA U.S. MAIL: By placing the document(s) in a sealed envelope for collection and mailing with the United States Postal Service on this date addressed to the person(s) listed below. I am familiar with our business practices for collecting and processing of mail for the United States Postal Service. Mail placed by me within the office for collection for the United States Postal Service would normally be deposited with the United States Postal Services that same day in the ordinary course of business. NON-ECF FILERS Gary Black Holli BeamBlack 101 Auld Court Green Valley Falls, CA 94534 BY E-MAIL: by causing to be transmitted via e-mail the document(s) listed above to the addressee(s) at the e-mail address(es) listed below. NON-ECF FILERS Gary Black Holli BeamBlack Email: gerald@raymondavich.com I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed at Palo Alto, California on August 30, 2010. /s Deborah Grubbs Deborah Grubbs CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE CASE NO.: C 10-02381 CW -1-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?