United States v. Miles et al
Filing
43
ORDER Granting 42 Stipulation to Continue Hearing 26 MOTION for Summary Judgment set for 10/6/2011 02:00 PM before Hon. Claudia Wilken. Case Management Statement due by 9/29/2011. Case Management Conference set for 10/6/2011 02:00 PM. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 7/21/2011. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/21/2011)
1
2
3
4
5
MELINDA HAAG (CSBN 122612)
United States Attorney
THOMAS MOORE (ALBN 4305-O78T)
Chief, Tax Division
11th Floor Federal Building
450 Golden Gate Avenue, Box 36055
San Francisco, California 94102
Telephone: (415) 436-7017
Fax:
(415) 436-7009
Attorneys for the United States of America
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
OAKLAND DIVISION
9
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
10
Plaintiff,
11
v.
12
MARY ELIZABETH MILES et al.,
13
Defendants.
14
15
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CASE NO. CV-10-2398 CW
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE
HEARING
It is hereby stipulated by and between Plaintiff United States and Defendants Mary
16
Elizabeth Miles and Kristina Miles-Toland, through their respective counsel, that the hearing on
17
the United States’ Motion for Summary Judgment be continued from August 11, 2011 to
18
October 6, 2011 at 2:00 p.m. This continuance will allow the United States adequate time to
19
finalize its legal position after obtaining guidance from the Department of Justice in response to
20
Defendant Mary Elizabeth Miles’ request for innocent spouse relief (Opposition of Mary
21
Elizabeth Miles at 2-7), and to gather any discovery, if necessary. IT IS SO STIPULATED.
22
23
/s
CINDY HO
Attorney for Mary Elizabeth Miles
MELINDA HAAG
United States Attorney
/s
J. BRITTAIN HABEGGER
Attorney for Kristina Miles-Toland
/s
THOMAS MOORE
Chief, Tax Division
24
25
26
27
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. Case management
conference is continued to 10/6/2011 at 2:00 p.m.
28
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?