United States v. Miles et al

Filing 63

ORDER re July 9, 2012 letter sent by Plaintiff's counsel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nandor J. Vadas on July 13, 2012. (njvlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/13/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 United States 9 Plaintiff, ORDER RE PLAINTIFF’S LETTER OF JULY 9, 2012 v. 11 Mary E. Miles, et al., 12 Defendant(s). ___________________________________/ 13 14 The Court has received the letter sent by Plaintiff’s counsel on July 9, 2012, and notes once 15 again that counsel has not conformed with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure nor the Local Rules 16 of this Court. If the parties wish to continue the settlement conference scheduled for Monday, July 17 16, 2012, they must file a motion or stipulation requesting that relief, together with a proposed order. 18 If the parties propose to continue the settlement conference to a date outside the deadline set by the 19 trial judge, they shall submit a motion to expand the time period in which a settlement conference 20 may be held to the trial judge. 21 22 If the motion is not filed and the settlement conference is held on July 16, 2012, the Court will not accept the reasons stated in the letter as a reason for failing to settle the matter. 23 IT IS SO ORDERED. R NIA adas dor J. V an Judge N FO S RT ER Nandor J. VadasF C N United DIS T RIC T O States Magistrate Judge H 28 ERED O ORD IT IS S NO 27 Dated: July 13, 2012 LI 26 S DISTRICT TE C TA RT U O 25 A 24 UNIT ED For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 No. C-10-02398 CW (NJV)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?