De Fernandez et al v. United States Department of Veterans Affairs et al

Filing 47

ORDER re 46 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER to Continue Hearing on Motion to Dismiss filed by Eric Shinseki, David West, Michael Walcoff, Bradley G. Mayes, United States Department of Veterans Affairs, Set/Reset Deadlines as to [46 ] STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER to Continue Hearing on Motion to Dismiss, 43 Second Revised MOTION to Dismiss Complaint. Motion Hearing set for 10/16/2012 01:00 PM before Hon. Saundra Brown Armstrong.. Signed by Judge ARMSTRONG on 9/4/12. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/5/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 STUART F. DELERY Acting Assistant Attorney General JUDRY L. SUBAR Assistant Branch Director LYNN Y. LEE (SBN #235531) U.S. Department of Justice Civil Division, Federal Programs Branch P.O. Box 883 Washington, D.C. 20044 Telephone: 202-305-0531 Facsimile: 202-616-8470 E-mail: lynn.lee@usdoj.gov Attorneys for Defendants UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 ROMEO R. DE FERNANDEZ et al., Plaintiffs, 13 14 15 CASE NO. C 10-02468 (SBA) [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING HEARING ON MOTION TO DISMISS v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS Dkt. 46 AFFAIRS et al. 16 Defendants. 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Upon reviewing the parties’ Stipulation to Continue Hearing on Motion to Dismiss, the Court hereby ORDERS that the hearing on defendants’ Second Revised Motion to Dismiss currently scheduled for September 18, 2012 at 1:00 pm be continued to October 16, 2012, at 1:00 p.m. The Court, in its discretion, may resolve the motion without oral argument. Fed. R. Civ. P. 78(b); Civ. L.R. 7-1(b). The parties are advised to check the Court’s website to determine whether an appearance is required. PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 26 Dated: 9-4-12 Hon. Saundra B. Armstrong United States District Judge 27 28 1 PROPOSED ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION Case No. 10-2468

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?