L.A. Specialty Produce Co., Inc. v. Sellers Markets, Inc. et al

Filing 10

ORDER DIRECTING PARTIES TO FILE CONSENT/DECLINATION FORM. Signed by Judge Beeler on 8/24/10. (lblc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/25/2010)

Download PDF
L.A. Specialty Produce Co., Inc. v. Sellers Markets, Inc. et al Doc. 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 UNITED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 12 For the Northern District of California UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Northern District of California Oakland Division L A SPECIALTY PRODUCE, v. Plaintiff(s), No. C 10-02506 LB ORDER DIRECTING PARTIES TO FILE CONSENT/DECLINATION FORM 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 SELLERS MARKETS, Defendant(s). _____________________________________/ This civil case was randomly assigned to United States Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler for all purposes including trial. In accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636(c), magistrate judges are designated to conduct any and all proceedings in a civil case, including trial and entry of final judgment, upon the consent of the parties. An appeal from a judgment entered by Judge Beeler may be taken directly to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in the same manner as an appeal from any other judgment of a district court. The parties have not filed written consents to Judge Beeler's jurisdiction. The parties also have the right to have their case assigned to a United States District Judge for trial and disposition. Accordingly, the parties shall inform the court whether they consent to Judge Beeler's jurisdiction or request reassignment to a United States District Judge. Each party shall file either a consent or /// /// /// ORDER (C 10-02506) Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 12 For the Northern District of California declination form attached to this Order by September 2, 2010. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: August 24, 2010 _______________________________ LAUREL BEELER United States Magistrate Judge 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER (C 10-02506) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 12 For the Northern District of California UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Northern District of California Oakland Division L A SPECIALTY PRODUCE, Plaintiff(s), v. SELLERS MARKETS, Defendant(s). ___________________________________/ CONSENT TO PROCEED BEFORE A UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE In accordance with the provisions of Title 28, U.S.C. 636(c), the undersigned party hereby consents to have a United States Magistrate Judge conduct any and all further proceedings in the case, including trial and the entry of a final judgment. Appeal from the judgment shall be taken directly to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. No. C 10-02506 LB CONSENT TO PROCEED BEFORE A UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: ________________________ ___________________________________ Signature Counsel for _________________________ (Plaintiff, Defendant or indicate "pro se") C 10-02506 LB 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 12 For the Northern District of California UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Northern District of California Oakland Division L A SPECIALTY PRODUCE, Plaintiff(s), v. SELLERS MARKETS, Defendant(s). ___________________________________/ REQUEST FOR REASSIGNMENT TO A UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE The undersigned party declines to consent to the assignment of this case to a United States Magistrate Judge and requests the reassignment of this case to a United States District Judge. No. C 10-02506 LB DECLINATION TO PROCEED BEFORE A UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND REQUEST FOR REASSIGNMENT TO A UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: ________________________ Signature___________________________ Counsel for _________________________ (Plaintiff, Defendant, or indicate "pro se") C 10-02506 LB

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?