Boykin v. Potter et al
Filing
29
STIPULATION AND ORDER REFERRING CASE to Mediation.. Signed by Judge ARMSTRONG on 3/28/11. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/30/2011)
Boykin v. Potter et al
Doc. 29
PAGE 04
03/25/2011 Case4:10-cv-02517-SBA Document26 Filed03/28/11 Page1 of 2 15:05 7075789308 NALC BRANCH 183
UNITED STATES DISTRICf COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFOR.~'1A
JESSE J. BOYKIN,
CASE NO.
Plaintiff(s),
v.
C 10-02517 SBA
JOHN E. POrrER. UN1TED STATES POSTMASTER GENERAL,
STIPULATION AND XXXXXXXX [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS
______________________
Detendant(s).
~I
Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have re!tChed the
following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5:
The parties agree to pmticipate in the following ADR process;
Court Proeesses:
Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4) Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5) Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)
"
(Note: Pal1ifts who beliewe that an early s~ttlemt!nt confolVlCt! with a Magistrate Judge is appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form ofADR, must participate in an ADR phone conference and may 1totjile this form. They must illsteadfile a Notice ofNeed for ADR Phone Co1ifert!!nce, See Civil Local Rule J6-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5)
Private Process:
Private ADR (please identifY proce~s and provider)
~_ _ _.....__.,..____~_
Tbe parties agree to hold the ADR session by:
" . the presumptive dea.dline (The deadline is 90 days from the date ofthe order
referring the case to an ADR process unles.s otherwise ordered.)
other requested deadline ------f-f-+-~M_Tt::-+:------.--
Dated: 03119/20 11
Attorney for
iff
Dated:. 3
r'l i/ I \
A ttomey for Defendant
~~
N
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?