Boykin v. Potter et al
Filing
77
ORDER, Set/Reset Deadlines as to 64 MOTION for Summary Judgment. Motion Hearing set for 12/6/2011 01:00 PM before Hon. Saundra Brown Armstrong.. Signed by Judge ARMSTRONG on 11/8/11. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/8/2011)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
OAKLAND DIVISION
10
JESSIE BOYKIN,
Case No: C 10-2517 SBA
11
Plaintiff,
12
ORDER CONTINUING MOTION
HEARING
vs.
13
PATRICK DONAHOE, United States
14 Postmaster General,
15
Defendant.
16
17
The hearing on Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. 64) scheduled for
18
November 15, 2011 is CONTINUED to December 6, 2011 at 1:00 p.m. The Court, in its
19
discretion, may resolve the motion without oral argument. Fed. R. Civ. P. 78(b); Civ. L.R.
20
7-1(b). The parties are advised to check the Court’s website to determine whether a court
21
appearance is required.
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: November 8, 2011
_______________________________
SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG
United States District Judge
1
2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
3
4
BOYKIN et al,
5
6
7
8
Plaintiff,
v.
POTTER ET AL et al,
Defendant.
/
9
10
Case Number: CV10-02517 SBA
11
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
12
13
14
15
I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. District
Court, Northern District of California.
That on November 8, 2011, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by placing said
copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by depositing
said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office delivery receptacle
located in the Clerk's office.
16
17
18
19
Jesse J. Boykin
745 Jackson Street
Fairfield, CA 94533-5715
20
Dated: November 8, 2011
21
Richard W. Wieking, Clerk
By: LISA R CLARK, Deputy Clerk
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?