Boykin v. Potter et al

Filing 77

ORDER, Set/Reset Deadlines as to 64 MOTION for Summary Judgment. Motion Hearing set for 12/6/2011 01:00 PM before Hon. Saundra Brown Armstrong.. Signed by Judge ARMSTRONG on 11/8/11. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/8/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 OAKLAND DIVISION 10 JESSIE BOYKIN, Case No: C 10-2517 SBA 11 Plaintiff, 12 ORDER CONTINUING MOTION HEARING vs. 13 PATRICK DONAHOE, United States 14 Postmaster General, 15 Defendant. 16 17 The hearing on Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. 64) scheduled for 18 November 15, 2011 is CONTINUED to December 6, 2011 at 1:00 p.m. The Court, in its 19 discretion, may resolve the motion without oral argument. Fed. R. Civ. P. 78(b); Civ. L.R. 20 7-1(b). The parties are advised to check the Court’s website to determine whether a court 21 appearance is required. 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: November 8, 2011 _______________________________ SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG United States District Judge 1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 4 BOYKIN et al, 5 6 7 8 Plaintiff, v. POTTER ET AL et al, Defendant. / 9 10 Case Number: CV10-02517 SBA 11 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 12 13 14 15 I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California. That on November 8, 2011, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by placing said copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office delivery receptacle located in the Clerk's office. 16 17 18 19 Jesse J. Boykin 745 Jackson Street Fairfield, CA 94533-5715 20 Dated: November 8, 2011 21 Richard W. Wieking, Clerk By: LISA R CLARK, Deputy Clerk 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?