TransPerfect Global, Inc. et al v. MotionPoint Corporation

Filing 201

ORDER by Judge Claudia Wilken Granting 200 Stipulation Regarding Continuation of Stay of Fact Discovery and Stay of Expert Proceedings Pending Resolution. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/26/2012)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

DOUGLAS E. LUMISH (Bar No. 183863)
[e-mail]
JEFFREY G. HOMRIG (Bar No. 215890)
[e-mail]
JOSEPH H. LEE (Bar No. 248046)
[e-mail]
L. OKEY ONYEJEKWE JR. (Bar No. 250354)
[e-mail]
JOSEPH B. SHEAR (Bar No. 262222)
[e-mail]
KASOWITZ, BENSON, TORRES & FRIEDMAN LLP
333 Twin Dolphin Drive, Suite 200
Redwood Shores, California 94065
Tel: [phone]; Fax: [phone]

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16

MICHAEL EISENBERG (pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
STEVEN D. CHIN (pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
STEFAN R. STOYANOV (pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
ROBERT P. WATKINS III (pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
KASOWITZ, BENSON, TORRES & FRIEDMAN LLP
1633 Broadway
New York, New York 10019
Tel: [phone]; Fax: [phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiffs/Counterclaim Defendants
TransPerfect Global, Inc., TransPerfect Translations
International, Inc., and Translations.com, Inc.

17

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

18

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

19

OAKLAND DIVISION

20
21

TRANSPERFECT GLOBAL, INC.,
TRANSPERFECT TRANSLATIONS
INTERNATIONAL, INC., AND
TRANSLATIONS.COM, INC.,

22
23
24
25
26

Plaintiffs/Counterclaim
defendants,
v.

Case No. CV 10-02590 CW (JCS)
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
RE: CONTINUATION OF STAY OF FACT
DISCOVERY AND STAY OF EXPERT
PROCEEDINGS PENDING RESOLUTION
OF MOTIONPOINT’S OBJECTION TO
ORDER GRANTING TRANSPERFECT’S
MOTION FOR DISQUALIFICATION (D.I.
198)

MOTIONPOINT CORPORATION,
Defendant/Counterclaim
plaintiff.

Judge: Hon. Claudia Wilken

27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE:
CONTINUATION OF STAY

CASE NO. CV 10-02590 CW (JCS)

STIPULATION

1
2

WHEREAS, The Court has entered an Order Granting TransPerfect’s Motion for

3

Disqualification of Counsel (D.I. 198) that disqualifies McDermott Will & Emery LLP from

4

representing MotionPoint in the above-captioned action;

5

WHEREAS, MotionPoint intends to lodge an objection to the Order Granting

6

TransPerfect’s Motion for Disqualification of Counsel, and, if necessary, retain replacement

7

counsel (the search for which has already commenced) in a reasonable time frame;

8

THEREFORE, the parties hereby stipulate and agree to a continuation of the stay of

9

discovery in the above-captioned matter, with said stay including expert proceedings (including

10

expert reports and expert discovery), until the Court has adjudicated MotionPoint’s objections,

11

and, if necessary, until MotionPoint has retained new counsel for this matter. This stipulation is

12

without prejudice to TransPerfect’s ability to raise with the Court any issues regarding any delay

13

in MotionPoint’s acquisition of new counsel.

14

SO STIPULATED.

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE:
CONTINUATION OF STAY

-1-

CASE NO. CV 10-02590 CW (JCS)

1

Dated: June 25, 2012

2

By: /s/ L. Okey Onyejekwe Jr.
L. Okey Onyejekwe, Jr.
Kasowitz, Benson, Torres & Friedman LLP
Attorneys for Plaintiffs/Counterclaim
Defendants TransPerfect Global, Inc.,
TransPerfect Translations International,
Inc., and Translations.com, Inc.

3
4
5
6
7

By: /s/ Adrian J. Sawyer
Adrian J. Sawyer
Kerr & Wagstaffe LLP
Appearing on a limited basis for
Defendant/Counterclaim Plaintiff
MotionPoint Corporation1

8
9
10
11
12
13

I hereby attest pursuant to General Order 45.X.B. that concurrence in the electronic filing
of this document has been obtained from the other signatories.

14
15

/s/L. Okey Onyejekwe, Jr.
L. Okey Onyejekwe, Jr.

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

1

In light of the Order Granting TransPerfect’s Motion for Disqualification of Counsel, Kerr & Wagstaffe LLP has
been authorized by MotionPoint Corporation to sign this Stipulation and [Proposed] Order. Kerr & Wagstaffe LLP is
not appearing as counsel for MotionPoint in this matter.
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE:
CONTINUATION OF STAY

-2-

CASE NO. CV 10-02590 CW (JCS)

1

[PROPOSED] ORDER

2

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

3
4
5

Date:

6/26/2012

6

_____________________________
HON. CLAUDIA WILKEN
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE:
CONTINUATION OF STAY

-3-

CASE NO. CV 10-02590 CW (JCS)