TransPerfect Global, Inc. et al v. MotionPoint Corporation

Filing 597

ORDER FOR FURTHER BRIEFING ON CONTEMPT MOTION. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 04/16/2015. (tmi, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/16/2015)

Download PDF
1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 4 5 6 TRANSPERFECT GLOBAL, INC., TRANSPERFECT TRANSLATIONS INTERNATIONAL, INC., and TRANSLATIONS.COM, INC., 9 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 ORDER FOR FURTHER BRIEFING ON CONTEMPT MOTION Plaintiffs, 7 8 No. C 10-2590 CW (Docket No. 578) v. MOTIONPOINT CORP., Defendant. ________________________________/ 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 On April 2, 2015, the Court held a hearing on TransPerfect's Motion for an Order to Show Cause Why MotionPoint Should Not be Held in Contempt for Violating the Permanent Injunction Prohibiting Infringement of U.S. Patent No. 6,857,022. The Court ordered the parties to meet and confer to determine a schedule for exchanging information and to set a briefing schedule to address new issues raised. The parties have not reported any agreement. Therefore, the Court hereby ORDERS MotionPoint to submit within two weeks of the date of this order: (1)records demonstrating compliance monitoring, discovered instances of noncompliance, and steps taken to fix instances of non-compliance; (2) a declaration or other evidence supporting the contention that its design-around is controlled and implemented by MotionPoint only and not by its customers; (3) a detailed plan to prevent noncompliance due to technical errors and the disabling of JavaScript. 1 Within two weeks of the date of MotionPoint's submission, 2 TransPerfect shall submit a brief no longer than ten pages 3 addressing any new issues raised by the submission and proposing a 4 remedy that is proportional to the alleged violation. 5 TransPerfect shall also attach itemized billing records to support 6 the amount of its request for attorneys' fees and costs. 7 Defendant may file a response of ten pages or less two weeks 8 thereafter. 9 seven days thereafter. United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 Plaintiff may file a reply of up to five pages within The matter will be decided on the papers unless a hearing is set by the Court. 11 12 IT IS SO ORDERED. 13 14 15 Dated: 04/16/2015 CLAUDIA WILKEN United States District Judge 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?