TransPerfect Global, Inc. et al v. MotionPoint Corporation

Filing 597

ORDER FOR FURTHER BRIEFING ON CONTEMPT MOTION. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 04/16/2015. (tmi, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/16/2015)

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

3
4
5
6

TRANSPERFECT GLOBAL, INC.,
TRANSPERFECT TRANSLATIONS
INTERNATIONAL, INC., and
TRANSLATIONS.COM, INC.,

9

United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10
11

ORDER FOR FURTHER
BRIEFING ON
CONTEMPT MOTION

Plaintiffs,

7
8

No. C 10-2590 CW

(Docket No. 578)
v.
MOTIONPOINT CORP.,
Defendant.
________________________________/

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

On April 2, 2015, the Court held a hearing on TransPerfect's
Motion for an Order to Show Cause Why MotionPoint Should Not be
Held in Contempt for Violating the Permanent Injunction
Prohibiting Infringement of U.S. Patent No. 6,857,022.

The Court

ordered the parties to meet and confer to determine a schedule for
exchanging information and to set a briefing schedule to address
new issues raised.

The parties have not reported any agreement.

Therefore, the Court hereby ORDERS MotionPoint to submit
within two weeks of the date of this order: (1)records
demonstrating compliance monitoring, discovered instances of noncompliance, and steps taken to fix instances of non-compliance;
(2) a declaration or other evidence supporting the contention that
its design-around is controlled and implemented by MotionPoint
only and not by its customers; (3) a detailed plan to prevent noncompliance due to technical errors and the disabling of
JavaScript.

1

Within two weeks of the date of MotionPoint's submission,

2

TransPerfect shall submit a brief no longer than ten pages

3

addressing any new issues raised by the submission and proposing a

4

remedy that is proportional to the alleged violation.

5

TransPerfect shall also attach itemized billing records to support

6

the amount of its request for attorneys' fees and costs.

7

Defendant may file a response of ten pages or less two weeks

8

thereafter.

9

seven days thereafter.

United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10

Plaintiff may file a reply of up to five pages within
The matter will be decided on the papers

unless a hearing is set by the Court.

11
12

IT IS SO ORDERED.

13
14
15

Dated: 04/16/2015
CLAUDIA WILKEN
United States District Judge

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2