Narraway et al -v- McConville et al

Filing 16

ORDER DIRECTING PARTIES TO FILE CONSENT/DECLINATION FORM BY JULY 8, 2010. Signed by Judge Beeler on 6/24/10. (lblc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/24/2010)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 UNITED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 12 For the Northern District of California UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Northern District of California Oakland Division ANDREW NARRAWAY v. Plaintiff(s), No. C 10-02648 LB ORDER DIRECTING PARTIES TO FILE CONSENT/DECLINATION FORM 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 JAMES D MCCONVILLE Defendant(s). _____________________________________/ Pending before the Court is Defendant Stewart Title of California, Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. #14). Upon review of the record in this action, the Court notes that the parties have not filed written consents to Magistrate Judge Beeler's jurisdiction. This civil case was randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Beeler for all purposes including trial. In accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636(c), the magistrate judges of this district court are designated to conduct any and all proceedings in a civil case, including trial and entry of final judgment, upon the consent of the parties. An appeal from a judgment entered by Magistrate Judge Beeler may be taken directly to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in the same manner as an appeal from any other judgment of a district court. You have the right to have your case assigned to a United States District Judge for trial and disposition. Accordingly, the parties shall inform the court whether they consent to Magistrate C 10-02648 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 12 For the Northern District of California Judge Beeler's jurisdiction or request reassignment to a United States District Judge for trial. Each party shall file either a consent or declination form attached to this Order by July 8, 2010. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: June 24, 2010 _______________________________ LAUREL BEELER United States Magistrate Judge 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 C 10-02648 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 12 For the Northern District of California UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Northern District of California Oakland Division 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ANDREW NARRAWAY, Plaintiff(s), v. JAMES D MCCONVILLE, Defendant(s). ___________________________________/ No. C 10-02648 LB CONSENT TO PROCEED BEFORE A UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE CONSENT TO PROCEED BEFORE A UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE In accordance with the provisions of Title 28, U.S.C. 636(c), the undersigned party hereby consents to have a United States Magistrate Judge conduct any and all further proceedings in the case, including trial, and the entry of a final judgment. Appeal from the judgment shall be taken directly to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Dated: ________________________ ___________________________________ Signature Counsel for _________________________ (Plaintiff, Defendant or indicate "pro se") C 10-02648 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 12 For the Northern District of California UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Northern District of California Oakland Division 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ANDREW NARRAWAY, Plaintiff(s), v. JAMES D MCCONVILLE, Defendant(s). ___________________________________/ No. C 10-02648 LB DECLINATION TO PROCEED BEFORE A MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND REQUEST FOR REASSIGNMENT TO A UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE REQUEST FOR REASSIGNMENT TO A UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE The undersigned party hereby declines to consent to the assignment of this case to a United States Magistrate Judge for trial and disposition and hereby requests the reassignment of this case to a United States District Judge. Dated: ________________________ Signature___________________________ Counsel for _________________________ (Plaintiff, Defendant, or indicate "pro se") C 10-02648 4

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?