Adobe Systems Incorporated v. Kornrumpf
Filing
131
ORDER by Judge Claudia Wilken GRANTING 130 MOTION TO REMOVE ERRONEOUSLY FILED DOCUMENT.(ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/23/2011)
1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
3
4
ADOBE SYSTEMS INCORPORATED,
5
6
7
8
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
Plaintiff,
v.
HOOPS ENTERPRISE LLC; and ANTHONY
KORNRUMPF,
No. C 10-2769 CW
ORDER GRANTING
MOTION TO REMOVE
ERRONEOUSLY FILED
DOCUMENT
(Docket No. 130)
Defendants.
________________________________/
AND ALL RELATED CLAIMS
________________________________/
12
13
On November 22, 2011, the Court granted a motion to file
14
under seal filed by Defendants and Counter-claimants Hoops
15
Enterprise LLC and Anthony Kornrumpf, permitting Defendants to
16
file under seal an unredacted version of Exhibit Four offered in
17
support of their opposition to Plaintiff Adobe Systems
18
Incorporated’s motion for a preliminary injunction and to file a
19
redacted version of Exhibit Four on the public record.
20
Subsequently, Defendants filed a motion representing to the
21
Court that they had inadvertently filed the unredacted version of
22
Exhibit Four on the public record as Docket No. 127, instead of
23
under seal.
24
unredacted version of Exhibit Four under seal as Docket No. 129.
25
Defendants requested a court order removing Docket No. 127 as an
26
incorrectly filed document.
27
28
Defendants further stated that they had re-filed the
1
Accordingly, Defendants’ motion to remove the unredacted
2
version of Exhibit Four from the public record is GRANTED. (Docket
3
No. 130)
4
record.
5
The clerk shall remove Docket No. 127 from the public
IT IS SO ORDERED.
6
7
8
Dated: 11/23/2011
CLAUDIA WILKEN
United States District Judge
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?