Adobe Systems Incorporated v. Kornrumpf
Filing
64
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 63 Proposed Order filed by Adobe Systems Incorporated, Hoops Enterprise LLC. Signed by Judge Donna M. Ryu on 5/26/11. (dmrlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/26/2011)
1
2
3
4
5
6
John D. McCurdy, Esq., State Bar No. 54091
Reagan E. Boyce, Esq., State Bar No. 248064
McCURDY & LEIBL, LLP
12925 Riverside Drive, Third Floor
Sherman Oaks, California 91423
Tel: (818) 380-0123
Fax: (818) 380-0124
Attorneys for Defendants / Counter-Claimants, Hoops Enterprise, LLC (erroneously sued and
served as Tony Kornrumpf), and Anthony Kornrumpf
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
Adobe Systems Incorporated,
12
13
Case No.: CV1002769 CW (DMR)
[Assigned for All Purposes to:
Hon. Claudia Wilken, Courtroom 2]
Plaintiff,
17
[PROPOSED] ORDER RE: JOINT
STIPULATION TO EXTEND THE
Anthony Kornrumpf a/k/a Tony Kornrumpf and DEADLINE TO SUBMIT A JOINT
Does 1-10, Inclusive,
LETTER BRIEF TO MAGISTRATE
JUDGE RYU ON AN UNRESOLVED
Defendants.
DISCOVERY ISSUE
____________________________________
______________________________________
Complaint Filed: 06/24/10
18
And Related Actions.
14
15
16
vs.
19
20
HAVING reviewed and considered the JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND THE
21
DEADLINE TO SUBMIT A JOINT LETTER BRIEF TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE RYU ON
22
AN UNRESOLVED DISCOVERY ISSUE filed by Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, ADOBE
23
SYSTEMS, INC. (“ADOBE”) and Defendants/Counter-Claimants, HOOPS ENTERPRISE, LLC
24
(erroneously sued and served as ANTHONY KORNRUMPF a/k/a TONY KORNRUMPF) and
25
ANTHONY KORNRUMPF, (collectively “HOOPS”), regarding the parties current meet and
26
confer efforts and intent to discovery dispute submit a matter to the Court for resolution,
27
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED AS FOLLOWS:
28
The parties may file a joint letter brief pursuant to the Court’s Standing Order on
1
[Proposed] Order Re: Joint Stipulation to Extend the Deadline to Submit a Joint Letter Brief to
Magistrate Judge Ryu on an Unresolved Discovery Issue
1
discovery disputes within ten (10) business days from the date of their last meet and confer
2
discussion on May 16, 2011.
3
DATED:______May 26__________, 2011
_______________________________
Hon. Donna . Ryu, Magistrate Judge
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
[Proposed] Order Re: Joint Stipulation to Extend the Deadline to Submit a Joint Letter Brief to
Magistrate Judge Ryu on an Unresolved Discovery Issue
1
PROOF OF SERVICE
2
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGAELES
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
I am employed in the County of Sherman Oaks, State of California. I am over the age of
18 and not a party to the within action; my business address is 12925 Riverside Drive, Third
Floor, Sherman Oaks, California 91423.
On May 20, 2011, I served the foregoing document described as [PROPOSED] ORDER
RE: JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND THE DEADLINE TO SUBMIT A JOINT
LETTER BRIEF TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE RYU ON AN UNRESOLVED
DISCOVERY ISSUE on the parties in this action by placing a true copy(ies) or the original(s)
thereof enclosed in a sealed envelope(s) addressed as follows:
Attorneys for Plaintiff, Adobe Systems, Inc.
J. Andrew Coombs, Esq.
Annie Wang, Esq.
andy@coombspc.com
annie@coombspc.com
12
13
14
15
16
(ELECTRONIC MAIL)
I transmitted a true and correct copy of said document to the addressees on the service
list via Electronic Mail.
(FEDERAL)
I declare that I am employed in the office of a member of the bar of this court at whose
direction the service was made.
17
Executed on May 20, 2011, at Sherman Oaks, California.
18
19
Robyn Planck
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
[Proposed] Order Re: Joint Stipulation to Extend the Deadline to Submit a Joint Letter Brief to
Magistrate Judge Ryu on an Unresolved Discovery Issue
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?