Ritz Camera & Image, LLC v. Sandisk Corporation et al
ORDER, Motions terminated: 100 MOTION to Return this Matter to the Hon. Jeremy Fogel with Return of Mandate with Proposed Order filed by Ritz Camera & Image, LLC. Case Management Conference set for 2/27/2013 02:45 PM. VIA TELEPHONE. Signed by Judge ARMSTRONG on 1/25/13. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/25/2013)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
RITZ CAMERA & IMAGE, LLC, a
7 Delaware limited liability company, on behalf
of itself and all others similarly situated,
Case No: C 10-02787 SBA
SANDISK CORPORATION; ELIYAHOU
On January 23, 2013, Plaintiff filed a motion entitled "Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion
to Return this Matter to the Hon. Jeremy Fogel with Return of Mandate." Dkt. 100.
Plaintiff requests that this case be "returned" to Judge Fogel now that the mandate has been
issued by the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. Id. However, because
Judge Fogel is no longer serving as a judge in the Northern District of California, Plaintiff's
motion is DENIED.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion to Return this Matter to the Hon. Jeremy Fogel
with Return of Mandate is DENIED.
A Case Management Conference is scheduled for February 27, 2013 at 2:45
p.m. Prior to the date scheduled for the conference, the parties shall meet and confer and
prepare a joint Case Management Conference Statement. Plaintiff is responsible for filing
the joint statement no less than seven (7) days prior to the conference date. The joint
statement shall comply with the Standing Order for All Judges of the Northern District of
California and the Standing Orders of this Court. Plaintiff is responsible for setting up the
conference call, and on the specified date and time, shall call (510) 637-3559 with all
parties on the line.
This Order terminates Docket 100.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?