Ritz Camera & Image, LLC v. Sandisk Corporation et al

Filing 304

ORDER. The Court's order denying Defendant's motion to exclude and granting in part Plaintiffs' motion to certify class and for appointment of class counsel (dkt no. 302 ) shall be unsealed. Signed by Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong on 5/28/2015. (mklS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/28/2015)

1
2
3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
4

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
5

OAKLAND DIVISION
6
7 ALFRED T. GIULIANO, Chapter 7

Trustee of the Ritz Estate; CPM
8 ELECTRONICS INC.; E.S.E.
ELECTRONICS, INC.; and MFLASH, INC.,
9 on Behalf of Themselves and All Others
Similarly Situated,

Case No: C 10-02787 SBA
ORDER

10

Plaintiffs,
11

vs.
12

SANDISK CORPORATION,
13

Defendant.
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

On May 14, 2015, the Court issued an order denying Defendant’s motion to exclude
and granting in part Plaintiffs’ motion to certify class and for appointment of class counsel.
Dkt. 302. This order was filed under seal pending further order of the Court because it may
contain information within the scope of the parties’ protective order. Id. The Court
directed the parties to jointly advise the Court which facts, if any, they contend should be
redacted from the public version of this order, and to provide the Court with the legal
authority for such request by no later than May 29, 2015. Id. On May 28, 2015, the parties
filed a joint letter advising the Court that neither party wishes to redact any portion of the
order. Dkt. 303. Accordingly, the order filed at Docket 302 shall be unsealed.
IT IS SO ORDERED
Dated: May 28, 2015
_______________________________
SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG
United States District Judge