Ritz Camera & Image, LLC v. Sandisk Corporation et al

Filing 304

ORDER. The Court's order denying Defendant's motion to exclude and granting in part Plaintiffs' motion to certify class and for appointment of class counsel (dkt no. 302 ) shall be unsealed. Signed by Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong on 5/28/2015. (mklS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/28/2015)

Download PDF
1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 OAKLAND DIVISION 6 7 ALFRED T. GIULIANO, Chapter 7 Trustee of the Ritz Estate; CPM 8 ELECTRONICS INC.; E.S.E. ELECTRONICS, INC.; and MFLASH, INC., 9 on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated, Case No: C 10-02787 SBA ORDER 10 Plaintiffs, 11 vs. 12 SANDISK CORPORATION, 13 Defendant. 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 On May 14, 2015, the Court issued an order denying Defendant’s motion to exclude and granting in part Plaintiffs’ motion to certify class and for appointment of class counsel. Dkt. 302. This order was filed under seal pending further order of the Court because it may contain information within the scope of the parties’ protective order. Id. The Court directed the parties to jointly advise the Court which facts, if any, they contend should be redacted from the public version of this order, and to provide the Court with the legal authority for such request by no later than May 29, 2015. Id. On May 28, 2015, the parties filed a joint letter advising the Court that neither party wishes to redact any portion of the order. Dkt. 303. Accordingly, the order filed at Docket 302 shall be unsealed. IT IS SO ORDERED Dated: May 28, 2015 _______________________________ SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?