Ritz Camera & Image, LLC v. Sandisk Corporation et al

Filing 87

ORDER re 84 Order on Motion for Miscellaneous Relief, ***Civil Case Terminated.. Signed by Judge ARMSTRONG on 10/26/11. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/27/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 OAKLAND DIVISION 5 RITZ CAMERA & IMAGE, LLC, a Case No: C 10-2787 SBA 6 Delaware limited liability company, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, 7 ORDER ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSING ACTION Plaintiff, 8 vs. 9 SANDISK CORPORATION; ELIYAHOU 10 HARARI, Defendants. 11 12 13 On September 7, 2011, the Honorable Jeremy Fogel granted Defendants’ request to 14 certify his Order of February 24, 2011 for interlocutory appeal to the Federal Circuit. Dkt. 15 84. In addition, Judge Fogel granted Defendants’ request to stay discovery pending 16 resolution of the appeal. Id. On September 28, 2011, the action was reassigned from Judge 17 Fogel to this Court. Dkt. 86. Given that no further action in this case is contemplated 18 during the pendency of the appeal, the Court finds good cause to hold the matter in 19 abeyance until such time as the Federal Circuit resolves the pending appeal. Accordingly, 20 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 21 1. 22 23 The instant action is ADMINISTRATIVE CLOSED and the action shall be held in ABEYANCE pending further order of the Court. 2. Within seven (7) days of the Federal Circuit’s ruling on Defendants’ appeal, 24 the parties shall jointly notify the Court and request the scheduling of a Case Management 25 Conference. 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: October 26, 2011 ______________________________ SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?