Bermudez v. City of Berkeley et al

Filing 50

ORDER. Signed by Judge Laporte on 3/2/11. (edllc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/2/2011)

Download PDF
Bermudez v. City of Berkeley et al Doc. 50 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 12 For the Northern District of California UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Northern District of California Oakland Division JOSE BERMUDEZ, Plaintiff, v. BERKELEY BOWL PRODUCE, INC., et al., Defendants. _____________________________________/ No. C 10-2893 CW ORDER RE: ATTENDANCE AT ENE Date: Evaluator: March 11, 2011 Edwin Wilson 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the request for defendant Berkeley Bowl Produce, Inc.'s insurer representative, Mitchell Roberts, to be excused from personal attendance at the March 11, 2011 ENE session before Edwin Wilson is DENIED. The court finds that Mr. Roberts has not made adequate showing that his being required to appear in person at the ENE would cause him `extraordinary or otherwise unjustifiable hardship' as required by ADR L.R. 5-10(d). Accordingly, the request is DENIED and Mr. Roberts is ORDERED to appear in person at the ENE. IT IS SO ORDERED. March 2, 2011 Dated By: Elizabeth D. Laporte United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?