United States of America v. Counterfeit Merchandise and Proceeds from Sales of Counterfeit Merchandise, Including: et al
Filing
65
ORDER re 62 Joint Case Management Statement. Signed by Judge JEFFREY S. WHITE on 8/19/14. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/19/2014)
1
2
3
4
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
8
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
No. C 10-03054 JSW
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER RE CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
DEFENDANT PROCEEDS FROM SALES
OF COUNTERFEIT MERCHANDISE,
INCLUDING,
(1) APPROXIMATELY $3,987 IN U.S.
CURRENCY FROM A RESIDENCE
LOCATED AT 558 UNION ST., SAN
FRANCISCO, CA et al.,
14
Defendants.
15
16
HIU JIN CHEN, IRENE MEI, CHIEN
CHUAN MEI, AND ALAN MEI,
17
Claimants
/
18
19
The Court has reviewed the parties’ joint case management conference statement. The
20
parties have not included dates for pretrial and trial. Accordingly, by no later than August 25,
21
2014, the parties shall submit a revised case management conference statement that includes the
22
following information:
23
1.
Proposed dates for a final pretrial conference and trial. The parties shall
24
familiarize themselves with the Court’s guidelines for civil bench and jury trials,
25
which sets forth deadlines and requirements for pretrial filings.
26
2.
A specific ADR procedure and a deadline to complete ADR. If the parties do not
27
intend to proceed with ADR, they should explain why. The Court reserves the
28
right to order the parties to participate in a court ordered ADR procedure.
1
2
3
4
3.
The United States shall set forth its position on whether Docket Nos. 1-7 and 16
may be unsealed.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: August 19, 2014
JEFFREY S. WHITE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
5
6
7
8
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?