United States of America v. Counterfeit Merchandise and Proceeds from Sales of Counterfeit Merchandise, Including: et al

Filing 81

ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO ORDER DATED SEPTEMBER 8, 2014. Signed by Judge JEFFREY S. WHITE on 9/17/14. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/17/2014)

1
2
3
4

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

8
9

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

12
13

No. C 10-03054 JSW

Plaintiff,
v.

ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO
RESPOND TO ORDER DATED
SEPTEMBER 8, 2014

DEFENDANT PROCEEDS FROM SALES
OF COUNTERFEIT MERCHANDISE,
INCLUDING,
(1) APPROXIMATELY $3,987 IN U.S.
CURRENCY FROM A RESIDENCE
LOCATED AT 558 UNION ST., SAN
FRANCISCO, CA et al.,

14
Defendants.
15
16

HIU JIN CHEN, IRENE MEI, CHIEN
CHUAN MEI, AND ALAN MEI,

17

Claimants
/

18
19

On September 8, 2014, the Court issued an Order regarding the fact that Docket No. 76

20

was inadvertently filed in the public record, although it contained privileged information. The

21

Court Ordered that Plaintiff or any other counsel, other than counsel for the Mei claimants, who

22

electronically received a copy of Document No. 76 and had not yet opened that document or

23

reviewed it, not to open it and to file a notice certifying that they have complied with the

24

Court’s directive by September 12, 2014. The Court also ordered that, if counsel for Plaintiff or

25

any other counsel who received Docket No. 76 had opened the document, they were to destroy

26

Docket No. 76 or return their copy to counsel for the Mei claimants and to file a notice attesting

27

they have done so by September 12, 2014.

28

As of the date of this Order, none of the parties have complied with the Court’s Order.
Accordingly, the Court shall extend the time to file the notice required by the Court’s previous

1

order to September 24, 2014. If the Court has not received the requisite notices by that date,

2

the Court shall issue an order to show cause as to why sanctions should not be imposed for

3

failure to comply with the Court’s Order.

4
5

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: September 17, 2014
JEFFREY S. WHITE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

6
7
8
9

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2