United States of America v. Counterfeit Merchandise and Proceeds from Sales of Counterfeit Merchandise, Including: et al

Filing 84

ORDER re 70 Amended MOTION to Strike Claims and Answer of Irene Mei, Chien Chuan Mei and Alan Mei. Joint Status Report due by 10/3/2014. Signed by Judge JEFFREY S. WHITE on 9/18/14. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/18/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 8 9 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 No. C 10-03054 JSW Plaintiff, v. ORDER RE MOTION TO STRIKE CLAIMS OF MEI CLAIMANTS DEFENDANT PROCEEDS FROM SALES OF COUNTERFEIT MERCHANDISE, INCLUDING, (Docket No. 70) (1) APPROXIMATELY $3,987 IN U.S. CURRENCY FROM A RESIDENCE LOCATED AT 558 UNION ST., SAN FRANCISCO, CA et al., 14 Defendants. 15 16 HIU JIN CHEN, IRENE MEI, CHIEN CHUAN MEI, AND ALAN MEI, 17 Claimants / 18 19 On August 26, 2014, the Plaintiff filed an amended motion to strike the claims of the 20 “Mei Claimants,” which is noticed for a hearing on October 31, 2014. Although counsel for the 21 Mei Claimants had moved to withdraw, she subsequently withdrew that motion and stated that 22 the Mei Claimants had accepted Plaintiff’s offer to settle this matter. (See Docket No. 79.) The 23 Mei claimants did not file a substantive response to Plaintiff’s motion, and the Plaintiff did not 24 file a reply brief. 25 26 27 28 The Court HEREBY ORDERS the parties to submit a joint status report by October 3, 2014, in which they set forth the status of any settlement and whether a hearing on the motion to 1 2 3 strike set for October 31, 2014, is necessary or whether that motion is now moot. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: September 18, 2014 JEFFREY S. WHITE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 4 5 6 7 8 9 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?