United States of America v. Counterfeit Merchandise and Proceeds from Sales of Counterfeit Merchandise, Including: et al
Filing
84
ORDER re 70 Amended MOTION to Strike Claims and Answer of Irene Mei, Chien Chuan Mei and Alan Mei. Joint Status Report due by 10/3/2014. Signed by Judge JEFFREY S. WHITE on 9/18/14. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/18/2014)
1
2
3
4
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
8
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
No. C 10-03054 JSW
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER RE MOTION TO STRIKE
CLAIMS OF MEI CLAIMANTS
DEFENDANT PROCEEDS FROM SALES
OF COUNTERFEIT MERCHANDISE,
INCLUDING,
(Docket No. 70)
(1) APPROXIMATELY $3,987 IN U.S.
CURRENCY FROM A RESIDENCE
LOCATED AT 558 UNION ST., SAN
FRANCISCO, CA et al.,
14
Defendants.
15
16
HIU JIN CHEN, IRENE MEI, CHIEN
CHUAN MEI, AND ALAN MEI,
17
Claimants
/
18
19
On August 26, 2014, the Plaintiff filed an amended motion to strike the claims of the
20
“Mei Claimants,” which is noticed for a hearing on October 31, 2014. Although counsel for the
21
Mei Claimants had moved to withdraw, she subsequently withdrew that motion and stated that
22
the Mei Claimants had accepted Plaintiff’s offer to settle this matter. (See Docket No. 79.) The
23
Mei claimants did not file a substantive response to Plaintiff’s motion, and the Plaintiff did not
24
file a reply brief.
25
26
27
28
The Court HEREBY ORDERS the parties to submit a joint status report by October 3,
2014, in which they set forth the status of any settlement and whether a hearing on the motion to
1
2
3
strike set for October 31, 2014, is necessary or whether that motion is now moot.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: September 18, 2014
JEFFREY S. WHITE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
4
5
6
7
8
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?