Formfactor, Inc. v. Micro-Probe Inc. et al

Filing 115

SCHEDULING ORDER; ORDER OF REFERENCE. Signed by Judge Hamilton on 3/16/2012. (pjhlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/16/2012)

1
2
3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

4

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

5
6
7

FORMFACTOR, INC.,
Plaintiff,

8
9

v.

SCHEDULING ORDER;
ORDER OF REFERENCE

MICRO-PROBE INC.,

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

No. C 10-3095 PJH

Defendant.
_______________________________/

12
13

The court is in receipt of letters from counsel regarding the scheduling of the cross-

14

motions for summary judgment. The court is agreeable to the schedule proposed by Micro-

15

Probe, with one exception. It is not possible for the court to prepare for a hearing on cross-

16

motions for summary judgment with only one week between the date the reply briefs are

17

filed and the date the motions are heard. Accordingly, the parties will file their motions on

18

April 4, 2012; the oppositions will be filed on April 18, 2012; the replies will be filed on April

19

25, 2012; and the date of the hearing will be Wednesday, May 9, 2012.

20

In addition, pursuant to Civil Local Rule 72-1, this matter is referred to Magistrate

21

Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte to conduct a settlement conference as soon as possible after

22

the close of discovery, which is March 30, 2012. The parties will be advised of the date,

23

time and place of appearance by notice from Magistrate Judge Laporte.

24
25

IT IS SO ORDERED.

26

Dated: March 16, 2012

27
28

______________________________
PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON
United States District Judge