Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. v. Panasonic Corporation et al

Filing 170

ORDER RE DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO OPERATIVE COMPLAINT. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 10/14/15. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/14/2015)

1
2
3
4
5
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

7
8
9

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.,
Plaintiff,

For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10
11
12
13

No. C 10-03098 JSW
ORDER RE DEADLINE TO RESPOND
TO OPERATIVE COMPLAINT

v.
PANASONIC CORPORATION, a Japanese
corporation, et al.,
Defendants.

14

/

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

The Court has received the motion of Defendants Panasonic Corporation and SD-3C LLC for
administrative relief regarding the time to answer Samsung’s Third or Fourth Amended Complaint
(Docket No. 168). The Court is disappointed that the parties were unable to resolve this issue
without assistance from this Court, and also disappointed by the timing of the motion.
To resolve any ambiguity in the September 30, 2015 Order, the Court hereby CLARIFIES,
sua sponte, that Defendants’ deadline to respond to Samsung’s operative Complaint is November 4,
2015, or fourteen days after Samsung files its Fourth Amended Complaint, whichever is earlier.
In light of this sua sponte clarification, Defendants’ administrative motion (Docket No. 168)
is denied as moot.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: October 14, 2015
JEFFREY S. WHITE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE