Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. v. Panasonic Corporation et al

Filing 182

ORDER by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers granting 178 Motion for Leave to File Reply; granting 180 Motion for Leave to File Response (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/26/2015)

1
2
3
4
5
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

7
8
9

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a
Korean corporation,

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

12
13
14

No. C 10-03098 JSW
ORDER RE ADMINISTRATIVE
MOTIONS

Plaintiff,
v.

Docket Nos. 178, 180

PANASONIC CORPORATION, a Japanese
corporation, et al.,
Defendants.

/

15
16

On October 14, 2015, Toshiba Corporation filed a motion to intervene and stay proceedings

17

pending arbitration. The motion was accompanied by an administrative motion to file portions of

18

the motion, as well as two exhibits, under seal. On October 19, 2015, Panasonic Corporation and

19

Panasonic Corporation of North America filed a memorandum in opposition to Toshiba’s

20

administrative motion to file under seal.

21

Now before the Court are: (1) Toshiba’s motion for leave to file a reply in support of its

22

motion to seal (Docket No. 178) and (2) Samsung Electronics Co.’s motion for leave to file a

23

response in support of Toshiba’s motion to seal (Docket No. 180). These administrative motions are

24

GRANTED. Toshiba’s reply and Samsung’s response are now due October 28, 2015. In addition to

25

any other issues that Toshiba and Samsung may address in the reply and response, Toshiba and

26

Samsung shall address whether the Court should order disclosure pursuant to a protective order.

27
28

The Court notes that neither Toshiba’s motion for leave to file a reply nor Samsung’s motion
for leave to file a response is accompanied by a stipulation or by a declaration reflecting an attempt
to meet and confer regarding these administrative motions. Counsel for Toshiba and Samsung are

1

admonished for their failure to comply with Northern District of California Civil Local Rule 7-11(a).

2

In the future, all motions for administrative relief “must be accompanied . . . by either a stipulation

3

under Civil L.R. 7-12 or by a declaration that explains why a stipulation could not be obtained.”

4

Civil L.R. 7-11(a).

5

All other pending motions shall be addressed by separate order.

6

IT IS SO ORDERED.

7

Dated: October 26, 2015

8

YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

9

for
JEFFREY S. WHITE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2