Dimenco et al v. Service Employees International Union et al

Filing 52

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Signed by Judge ARMSTRONG on 4/28/11. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/29/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 OAKLAND DIVISION 8 9 ROSEANNE DIMENCO, TYRONE DICKENS, RICHARD MARLOWE, JUAN 10 ANTONIO MOLINA, NICHOLAS PALAFOX, TONI RANGEL, STARLA 11 ROLLINS, MYKELE SAUNDERS, and MARTHA VAZQUEZ, Case No: C 10-03112 SBA ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL 12 Plaintiffs, 13 vs. 14 SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL 15 UNION, DAVID REGAN, and ELISEO MEDINA, 16 Defendants. 17 18 19 On January 10, 2011, the Court granted Defendants’ motion to disqualify Plaintiffs’ 20 counsel. Dkt. 50. The Court granted Plaintiffs thirty days to retain new counsel and to file 21 a substitution of counsel. The Court scheduled a Case Management Conference for April 22 28, 2011, and directed Plaintiffs to file a joint Case Management Conference Statement at 23 least ten days prior to that date. Plaintiffs have not filed a substitution of counsel nor have 24 they filed a Case Management Conference Statement. The failure to comply with the 25 Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Local Rules of the Court or any Court Order is 26 grounds for dismissal of this action under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). See 27 Ferdick v. Bonzelet, 963 F.2d 1258, 1260 (9th Cir. 1992). Accordingly, 28 1 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 2 1. 3 is VACATED. 4 2. The Case Management Conference previously scheduled for April 28, 2011, The parties shall show cause why the instant action should not be dismissed 5 (1) under Rule 41(b) for failure to comply with a Court order and (2) on mootness grounds, 6 for the reasons set forth in Defendants’ Case Management Statement filed on April 18, 7 2011 (Dkt. 51). Within seven (7) days of the date this order is filed, the parties shall file a 8 Certificate of Counsel to explain why the case should or should not be dismissed. The 9 Certificate shall set forth the nature of the cause, its present status, the reason it has not 10 been brought to trial or otherwise terminated, any basis for opposing dismissal and its 11 expected course if not dismissed. FAILURE TO FULLY COMPLY WITH THIS ORDER 12 WILL BE DEEMED SUFFICIENT GROUNDS TO DISMISS THE ACTION, WITHOUT 13 FURTHER NOTICE. 14 15 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: April 28, 2011 _______________________________ SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG United States District Judge 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?