Pinel v. Aurora Loan Services LLC

Filing 166

ORDER Re Motion for Reconsideration and Joint Letter Brief (lblc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/21/2012)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

Northern District of California

10

San Francisco Division
MARITZA PINEL, et al.,

12
For the Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

11

No. C 10-03118 SBA (LB)

Plaintiffs,
v.

ORDER REGARDING MOTION FOR
RECONSIDERATION AND JOINT
LETTER BRIEF

13
AURORA LOAN SERVICES LLC,
14
15

Defendant.
_____________________________________/

[ECF NO. 159]

16

The court previously granted the motion for reconsideration at ECF No. 159 and directed a joint

17

letter brief process instead of a formal motions process (at least as a first step). The parties advised

18

the court that they are working to resolve the dispute and that if any issues remain, they will file a

19

letter brief but not until at least the second week in January.

20

As an administrative matter, the court terminates the pending motion at ECF No. 159 and files

21

this order to show that. As a result, there will not be a motion deemed pending. If after the joint

22

letter process, the court sets a formal motions schedule, Aurora may refer to the motion already filed

23

(rather than re-filing it).

24

This disposes of ECF No. 159.

25

IT IS SO ORDERED.

26

Dated: December 21, 2012

27
28

ORDER
C 10-03118 SBA (LB)

_______________________________
LAUREL BEELER
United States Magistrate Judge