Pinel v. Aurora Loan Services LLC

Filing 169

ORDER by Judge ARMSTRONG granting (148) Administrative Motion to File Under Seal in case 4:10-cv-03118-SBA (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/16/2013)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

OAKLAND DIVISION

11

MAUDER and ALICE CHAO;
DEOGENESO and GLORINA PALUGOD;

12
and
13

[PROPOSED] ORDER SEALING
DOCUMENTS

MARITZA PINEL,
14

Consolidated Case
No. CV 10-3118-SBA
No. CV 10-3383-SBA

16

on behalf of themselves and all others similarly
situated,
Plaintiffs,
v.

17

AURORA LOAN SERVICES, LLC,

15

18

Dkt. 148

Defendant.

19
20

This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiffs’ Administrative Motion to File Under Seal

21

(Doc. # 148) certain documents filed by Plaintiffs in connection with Plaintiffs’ Renewed Motion for

22

Class Certification. See Doc. # 149. In particular, Plaintiffs request that certain documents be filed

23

under seal because those documents were produced by Aurora to Plaintiffs using the designation

24

“CONFIDENTIAL MATERIALS” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL MATERIALS” pursuant to the

25

Protective Order governing this litigation. See Doc. ## 85; 87. Plaintiffs also request that certain of

26

their briefs, containing confidential information, also be filed under seal. Aurora has filed a response

27

asserting that some of the documents should remain under seal and some may be filed publicly.

28

Having considered the Administrative Motion and Aurora’s response in support, it is hereby

[PROPOSED] ORDER SEALING DOCUMENTS
Case No. 10-3118-SBA

1
2
3
4

ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART as follows:
1.

Exhibit K qualifies as “sealable” under Local Rule 79-5(a) as a trade secret, and

therefore shall remain under seal.
2.

Exhibit E qualifies as “sealable” under Local Rule 79-5(a) as a document otherwise

5

entitled to protection under the law—namely, the Gramm Leach Bliley Act, 15 U.S.C. § 6801 et seq.,

6

and therefore shall remain under seal.

7

3.

Exhibits A, B, and C of Plaintiffs’ Renewed Trial Plan qualify as “sealable” under

8

Local Rule 79-5(a) as a document otherwise entitled to protection under the law—namely, the

9

Gramm Leach Bliley Act, 15 U.S.C. § 6801 et seq., and therefore shall remain under seal.

10
11
12
13

4.

unsealed and filed publicly:



14



15



16



17



18

The remaining documents identified in Plaintiffs’ motion and listed below should be



Plaintiffs’ Renewed Motion for Class Certification (Public Version at Doc. # 149)
Declaration of Thomas Loeser in Support of Plaintiffs’ Renewed Motion for Class
Certification (Public Version at Doc. # 150)
Exhibit C to the Declaration of Thomas Loeser in Support of Plaintiffs’ Renewed Motion for
Class Certification (Public Version at Doc. #150-3)
Exhibits F, G, & H to the Declaration of Thomas Loeser in Support of Plaintiffs’ Renewed
Motion for Class Certification (Public Version at Doc. #150-6 - 8)
Exhibits I & J to the Declaration of Thomas Loeser in Support of Plaintiffs’ Renewed
Motion for Class Certification (Public Version at Doc. #150-9 - 10)
Exhibit L to the Declaration of Thomas Loeser in Support of Plaintiffs’ Renewed Motion for
Class Certification (Public Version Doc. #150-12)
Plaintiffs’ Renewed Trial Plan (Public Version at Doc. # 151)

19
20

5.

This Order terminates Docket 148.

21
22

Dated: 1/16/13

___________________________________
United States District Judge

23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-

[PROPOSED] ORDER SEALING DOCUMENTS
Case No. 10-3118-SBA