Pinel v. Aurora Loan Services LLC
Filing
255
ORDER by Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong Granting 251 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/13/2015)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
OAKLAND DIVISION
12
14
MAUDER and ALICE CHAO; DEOGENESO
and GLORINA PALUGOD, and MARITZA
PINEL, individually and on behalf of all others
similarly situated,
15
Plaintiffs,
13
16
17
No. 10-cv-03118-SBA
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
PLAINTIFFS’ ADMINISTRATIVE
MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL
v.
AURORA LOAN SERVICES, LLC,
18
Defendant.
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
010191-11 741797 V1
Case No.: 10-cv-03118-SBA
1
2
3
4
This matter comes before the Court on the administrative motion to seal Exhibit A, Exhibit
B, and Exhibit C to the Amended Declaration of Thomas E. Loeser In Support of Plaintiffs’
Motion For Final Approval of Class Action Settlement (“the Exhibits”) because the Exhibits
contain unredacted sensitive information covered by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2, namely,
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
loan numbers.
Upon consideration of the motion to seal, the papers submitted in support and in opposition
thereto, and good cause appearing, the motion is GRANTED.
Plaintiffs have carried their burden of establishing that the designated information is
sealable, and therefore, this Court HEREBY ORDERS that the information be filed under seal.
IT IS SO ORDERED
12
13
14
DATED this ___________ day of _______________________, 2015.
13th
January
15
16
THE HONORABLE SAUNDRA B. ARMSTRONG
United States District Court Judge
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL
010191-11 741797 V1
-1-
Case No.: 10-cv-03118-SBA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?