Cabrera v. Long Beach Mortgage et al

Filing 6

ORDER Setting Case Management Conference. Case Management Statement due by 10/27/2010. Initial Case Management Conference set for 11/3/2010 01:30 PM in Courtroom 4, 3rd Floor, Oakland.. Signed by Judge Donna M. Ryu on 8/3/10. (Attachments: # 1 Standing Order)(dmrlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/3/2010)

Download PDF
Cabrera v. Long Beach Mortgage et al Doc. 6 Att. 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, OAKLAND DIVISION STANDING ORDER FOR MAGISTRATE JUDGE DONNA M. RYU (Revised July 23, 2010) Parties shall comply with the procedures in the Federal Rules of Civil or Criminal Procedure, the Northern District of California's Local Rules, General Orders, General Standing Orders, and this standing order. Local rules, general orders, general standing orders, and a summary of the general orders' electronic filing requirements (including the procedures for emailing proposed orders to chambers) are available at (click "Rules" link on left side). The parties' failure to comply with any of the rules or orders may be a ground for monetary sanctions, dismissal, entry of judgment, or other appropriate sanctions. CALENDAR DATES AND SCHEDULING 1. Criminal motions are heard on the second and fourth Thursdays of the month at 9:30 a.m., or during the regular criminal calendar when Judge Ryu is on criminal calendar duty. Civil motions are heard on the second and fourth Thursdays of the month at 11:00 a.m. Civil case management and status conferences are heard on Wednesdays at 1:30 p.m. Civil pretrial conferences are heard on Wednesdays at 3:00 p.m. 2. Parties should notice motions pursuant to the local rules. Parties need not reserve a hearing date in advance, but should confirm the Court's availability on the on-line calendar at (click "Calendars" link on left side, click link to Judge Ryu's calendar, click link to "Scheduling Information and Unavailability"). Noticed hearing dates may be reset as the Court's calendar requires. 1 3. For scheduling questions, please call Judge Ryu's courtroom deputy, Ivy Garcia at (510) 637-3639. CONSENT CASES 4. In civil cases that are randomly assigned to Judge Ryu for all purposes, the parties should file their written consent to the assignment of a United States Magistrate Judge for all purposes or their written declination of consent as soon as possible, and in no event later than the deadlines specified in Civil L.R. 73-1(a)(1) and (2). CHAMBERS COPIES AND PROPOSED ORDERS 5. Under Civil L.R. 5-1(b), parties must lodge an extra paper copy of any filing and mark it as a copy for "Chambers." Chambers copies shall be printed on three-hole punch paper (including all exhibits) and submitted to the Oakland Clerk's Office in an envelope clearly marked with the case number,"Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu," and "Chambers Copy." In a case subject to electronic filing, chambers copies must be submitted by the close of the next court day following the day the papers are filed electronically. 6. Any proposed stipulation or proposed order in a case subject to electronic filing shall be submitted by email to as a word processing format attachment on the same day that the document is e-filed. This address is to be used only for proposed orders unless otherwise directed by the Court. CIVIL CASE MANAGEMENT 7. No later than seven (7) days before the initial case management or status conference, the parties shall file a Joint Case Management Statement in full compliance with the Northern District of California's general standing order for civil cases entitled "Contents of Joint Case 2 Management Statement," a copy of which is attached hereto. 8. Parties may not stipulate to continue a case management conference, status conference, or pretrial conference without Court approval. Each party shall be represented in person at the Case Management Conference by lead trial counsel (or a party if in pro se), who shall be (1) prepared to address all of the matters referred to in the Northern District of California's general standing order on Joint Case Management Statements; and (2) have full authority to enter stipulations and make admissions pursuant to that order. The Court expects counsel to appear in person at case management conferences, unless they make a prior application showing good cause as to why the Court should permit a telephonic appearance. Permission for a party to attend by telephone may be granted, in the Court's discretion, upon written request made at least two weeks in advance of the hearing, if the Court determines that good cause exists to excuse personal attendance, and that personal attendance is not needed in order to have an effective conference. The facts establishing good cause must be set forth in the request. 9. All case management, status and pretrial conferences are audio recorded. They are not reported by a court reporter unless a party is pro se or unless counsel requests a court reporter in advance. CIVIL DISCOVERY Discovery Motions. 10. Discovery motions may be addressed to the Court in three ways: (1) a motion may be noticed on not less than thirty five (35) days' notice pursuant to Civil L.R. 7-2; (2) any party may seek an order shortening time under Civil L.R. 6-3 if the circumstances justify that relief; and (3) in emergencies during discovery events (such as depositions), any party may, after exhausting 3 good faith attempts to resolve disputed issues, seek judicial intervention pursuant to Civil L.R. 37-1(b) by contacting the Court through the courtroom deputy. If the Court is unavailable, the discovery event shall proceed with objections noted for the record. 11. In the event a discovery dispute arises, counsel for the party seeking discovery shall in good faith confer with counsel for the party failing to make the discovery in an effort to resolve the dispute without court action. The meet and confer session(s) must be in person or by telephone. Meet and confer sessions may not be conducted by letter, e-mail or fax. A declaration briefly setting forth the meet and confer efforts, and the final positions of each party, shall be included in the moving papers. Parties are strongly discouraged from including "meet and confer" letters as exhibits to discovery motions. The Court will not consider discovery motions unless the moving party has complied with Fed.R.Civ.P. 37 and Civil L.R. 37-1(a) and this standing order. 12. The Court has found that it is often efficient and beneficial for the parties if counsel appear in person at discovery hearings. This gives the Court the opportunity, where appropriate, to engage counsel in resolving aspects of the discovery dispute, while remaining available to rule on any disputes that counsel are not able to resolve. For this reason, the Court expects counsel to appear in person, unless they make a prior application showing good cause as to why the Court should permit a telephonic appearance. Permission for a party to attend by telephone may be granted, in the Court's discretion, upon written request made at least two weeks in advance of the hearing, if the Court determines that good cause exists to excuse personal attendance, and that personal attendance is not needed in order to have an effective discovery hearing. The facts establishing good cause must be set forth in the request. 4 Filing Documents Under Seal. 13. All requests to file documents under seal must comply with Civil L.R. 79-5, and any proposal to seal documents must be narrowly tailored to seal only that material for which good cause to seal has been established. IT IS SO ORDERED. ______________________________ DONNA M. RYU United States Magistrate Judge 5 STANDING ORDER FOR ALL JUDGES OF THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CONTENTS OF JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT Commencing March 1, 2007, all judges of the Northern District of California will require the identical information in Joint Case Management Statements filed pursuant to Civil Local Rule 16-9. The parties must include the following information in their statement which, except in unusually complex cases, should not exceed ten pages: 1. Jurisdiction and Service: The basis for the court's subject matter jurisdiction over plaintiff's claims and defendant's counterclaims, whether any issues exist regarding personal jurisdiction or venue, whether any parties remain to be served, and, if any parties remain to be served, a proposed deadline for service. 2. Facts: A brief chronology of the facts and a statement of the principal factual issues in dispute. 3. Legal Issues: A brief statement, without extended legal argument, of the disputed points of law, including reference to specific statutes and decisions. 4. Motions: All prior and pending motions, their current status, and any anticipated motions. 5. Amendment of Pleadings: The extent to which parties, claims, or defenses are expected to be added or dismissed and a proposed deadline for amending the pleadings. 6. Evidence Preservation: Steps taken to preserve evidence relevant to the issues reasonably evident in this action, including interdiction of any document-destruction program and any ongoing erasures of e-mails, voice mails, and other electronically-recorded material. 7. Disclosures: Whether there has been full and timely compliance with the initial disclosure requirements of Fed. R. Civ. P. 26 and a description of the disclosures made. 8. Discovery: Discovery taken to date, if any, the scope of anticipated discovery, any proposed limitations or modifications of the discovery rules, and a proposed discovery plan pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f). 9. Class Actions: If a class action, a proposal for how and when the class will be certified. 10. Related Cases: Any related cases or proceedings pending before another judge of this court, or before another court or administrative body. 11. Relief: All relief sought through complaint or counterclaim, including the amount of any -1- damages sought and a description of the bases on which damages are calculated. In addition, any party from whom damages are sought must describe the bases on which it contends damages should be calculated if liability is established. 12. Settlement and ADR: Prospects for settlement, ADR efforts to date, and a specific ADR plan for the case, including compliance with ADR L.R. 3-5 and a description of key discovery or motions necessary to position the parties to negotiate a resolution. 13. Consent to Magistrate Judge For All Purposes: Whether all parties will consent to have a magistrate judge conduct all further proceedings including trial and entry of judgment. 14. Other References: Whether the case is suitable for reference to binding arbitration, a special master, or the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation. 15. Narrowing of Issues: Issues that can be narrowed by agreement or by motion, suggestions to expedite the presentation of evidence at trial (e.g., through summaries or stipulated facts), and any request to bifurcate issues, claims, or defenses. 16. Expedited Schedule: Whether this is the type of case that can be handled on an expedited basis with streamlined procedures. 17. Scheduling: Proposed dates for designation of experts, discovery cutoff, hearing of dispositive motions, pretrial conference and trial. 18. Trial: Whether the case will be tried to a jury or to the court and the expected length of the trial. 19. Disclosure of Non-party Interested Entities or Persons: Whether each party has filed the "Certification of Interested Entities or Persons" required by Civil Local Rule 3-16. In addition, each party must restate in the case management statement the contents of its certification by identifying any persons, firms, partnerships, corporations (including parent corporations) or other entities known by the party to have either: (i) a financial interest in the subject matter in controversy or in a party to the proceeding; or (ii) any other kind of interest that could be substantially affected by the outcome of the proceeding. 20. Such other matters as may facilitate the just, speedy and inexpensive disposition of this matter. -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?