CSWL, Inc. et al v. Higher One, Inc.

Filing 34

STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO FILE REPLY BRIEF re 33 Stipulation filed by Higher One, Inc. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 11/29/10. (nah, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/29/2010)

CSWL, Inc. et al v. Higher One, Inc.

Doc. 34

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
WIGGIN AND DANA LLP 265 CHURCH STREET NEW HAVEN, CONNECTICUT 06508-1832 [phone]

Shawn M. Christianson (SBN 114707) Richard C. Darwin (SBN 161245) BUCHALTER NEMER A Professional Corporation 333 Market Street, 25th Floor San Francisco, CA 94105-2126 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Email: [e-mail] James I. Glasser (pro hac vice) Jenny R. Chou (pro hac vice) Elizabeth Richards Bing (SBN 254887) Wiggin & Dana LLP 265 Church Street New Haven, Connecticut 06508-1832 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Email: [e-mail] [e-mail] [e-mail] Attorneys for Defendant HIGHER ONE, Inc. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CSWL, INC., a California corporation and DAN G. PETERSON, a California resident, Plaintiffs, vs. HIGHER ONE, INC., a Delaware corporation, Defendant. Case No. C 10-3177 PJH

13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 WHEREAS, Defendant filed a Motion to Dismiss, or in the Alternative, to Transfer Venue to the District of Delaware, and to Strike Portions of the Complaint (Docket No. 13) (the Motion ) on October 27, 2010;
-1JOINT STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO FILE REPLY BRIEF Case No. C 10-3177 PJH Dockets.Justia.com

JOINT STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO FILE REPLY BRIEF

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
WIGGIN AND DANA LLP 265 CHURCH STREET NEW HAVEN, CONNECTICUT 06508-1832 [phone]

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs opposed the Motion on November 19, 2010, a Friday; WHEREAS, prior to the reassignment of this case to this Court, Magistrate Judge Zimmerman ordered that Plaintiffs opposition papers be filed by November 19, 2010, and any reply brief in further support of the Motion be filed by November 29, 2010, the Monday following the Thanksgiving holiday; WHEREAS, in view of the Thanksgiving holiday, Defendant requests an extension of two (2) days to file its reply brief, to December 1, 2010; WHEREAS, the Motion has been noticed for December 15, 2010, and the requested extension would not impact this hearing date; WHEREAS, this is the parties first request for an extension of time on the Motion; WHEREAS this request for an extension of time is made in good faith and not for the purpose of delay, and will not prejudice any party; WHEREAS, Plaintiffs and their counsel do not object to this extension; IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties through their respective counsel, that the deadline for Defendant to file a reply brief in further support of the Motion is extended from November 29, 2010 to December 1, 2010. IT IS SO STIPULATED.

13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24

Dated: November 23, 2010

HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP By: /s/ J. Christopher Mitchell

Attorneys for Plaintiffs CSWL, Inc. and Dan G. Peterson Dated: November 23, 2010 WIGGIN AND DANA LLP By: /s/ James I. Glasser James I. Glasser (pro hac vice)

25 26 27 28
-2JOINT STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO FILE REPLY BRIEF Case No. C 10-3177 PJH

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
WIGGIN AND DANA LLP 265 CHURCH STREET NEW HAVEN, CONNECTICUT 06508-1832 [phone]

BUCHALTER NEMER A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION By: /s/ Richard C. Darwin Richard C. Darwin

Attorneys for Defendant Higher One, Inc.

PURSUANT TO THE ABOVE STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

11/29/10 Dated: _________

S DISTRICT TE C TA _____________________________________

RT U O

THE HONORABLE PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON

UNIT ED

S

13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

J

ER

N

F D IS T IC T O R

-3JOINT STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO FILE REPLY BRIEF Case No. C 10-3177 PJH

A

C

LI

FO

yllis J. udge Ph

Hamilto

n

R NIA

O OR IT IS S

DERED

NO

RT

H