Guitron et al v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al

Filing 100

DISCOVERY ORDER re 99 Letter Brief filed by Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Yesenia Guitron, Pam Rubio, Judi Klosek, Wells Fargo & Co.. Signed by Judge Maria-Elena James on 12/14/2011. (cdnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/14/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 YESENIA GUITRON and JUDI KLOSEK, Plaintiffs, 8 No. C 10-3461 CW (MEJ) DISCOVERY ORDER v. Re: Docket No. 99 9 WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., et al., 10 Defendants. _____________________________________/ 12 For the Northern District of California UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 13 Pending before the Court is the parties’ joint discovery dispute letter filed on December 14, 14 2011. Dkt. No. 99. In the joint letter, Defendants Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Wells Fargo & Co., and 15 Pam Rubio seek to compel the deposition of Dreydy Metelin on a mutually convenient date before 16 trial. Defendants argue that good cause exists to grant their request because “Plaintiffs Yesenia 17 Guitron and Judi Klosek engaged in obstruction of Defendants’ ability to take Ms. Metelin’s 18 deposition before the fact discovery cut-off date—October 5, 2011—in this action.” Id. Federal 19 Rule of Civil Procedure 16(b)(4) permits a court to modify a scheduling order for good cause. 20 However, it is up to the presiding judge to determine whether a scheduling order should be 21 modified. Accordingly, Defendants’ request is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to bringing the 22 request before the presiding judge, the Honorable Claudia Wilken. 23 IT IS SO ORDERED. 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: December 14, 2011 _______________________________ Maria-Elena James Chief United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?