Guitron et al v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al

Filing 46

ORDER RE APPOINTMENT OF DISCOVERY REFEREE. Signed by Judge Maria-Elena James on 9/29/2011. (cdnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/29/2011)

Download PDF
1 ALLEN MATKINS LECK GAMBLE MALLORY & NATSIS LLP 2 BALDWIN J. LEE (BAR NO. 187413) ALEXANDER NESTOR (BAR NO. 202795) 3 Three Embarcadero Center, 12th Floor San Francisco, CA 94111-4074 4 Phone: (415) 837-1515 Fax: (415) 837-1516 5 E-Mail: blee@allenmatkins.com anestor@allenmatkins.com 6 Attorneys for Defendants 7 WELLS FARGO BANK, WELLS FARGO & CO. AND PAM RUBIO 8 YOSEF PERETZ (BAR NO. 209288) 9 EMILY A. KNOLES (BAR NO. 241671) MICHAEL D. BURSTEIN (BAR NO. 248516) 10 PERETZ & ASSOCIATES 22 Battery Street, Suite 202 11 San Francisco, CA 94111 Phone: 415-732-3777 12 Fax: 415-372-3791 13 Attorneys for Plaintiffs YESENIA GUITRON and JUDI KLOSEK 14 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 16 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - OAKLAND DIVISION 17 18 YESENIA GUITRON and JUDI KLOSEK, Plaintiffs, 19 20 vs. Case No. CIV-10-03461 CW [MEJ] PARTIES' THIRD STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING APPOINTMENT OF DISCOVERY REFEREE 21 WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.; WELLS FARGO & CO.; PAM RUBIO and DOES 1-20, 22 Defendants. 23 24 25 26 27 28 LAW OFFICES Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP 823291.01/SF Case No. CIV-10-03461 CW PARTIES' STIP AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE APPOINTMENT OF DISCOVERY REFEREE 1 WHEREAS, the parties have previously stipulated to using Commissioner Richard Best 2 (Ret.) as a discovery referee for the purpose of conducting depositions in this action, which the 3 Court has approved (see Docket No. 43); 4 WHEREAS, the parties now have stipulated to using Commissioner Richard Best (Ret.) as 5 a discovery referee for the purpose of conducting the depositions of additional witnesses noticed 6 by Defendants; 7 WHEREAS, the parties have agreed that, in his role as discovery referee, Commissioner 8 Best shall have the authority and powers to: (1) rule on objects made during the course of the 9 depositions, (2) direct the witness to answer questions, and (3) rule on motions and other requests 10 by the parties relating to the scope of and conduct of the depositions; 11 WHEREAS, the parties have agreed that Commissioner Best’s rulings: (1) are subject to 12 appeal to Magistrate Judge James, in the form of a joint letter, as set forth in Magistrate Judge 13 James; Standing Order Regarding Discovery & Dispute Procedures, but that any such appeal must 14 be filed within 10 calendar days following the ruling, and (2) must be in compliance with any 15 previous orders of Magistrate Judge James; 16 WHEREAS, the parties have agreed that Defendants will pay Commissioner Best’s fees 17 and costs related to the performance of his role as discovery referee for the depositions noticed by 18 Defendants; 19 THEREFORE, the parties, through their undersigned counsel below, hereby stipulate and 20 agree, and respectfully request that the Court issue an order that: 21 1. Commissioner Richard Best (Ret.) will serve as a discovery referee for the limited 22 purpose of conducting the additional depositions noticed by Defendants in this action. 23 Commissioner Best will serve in this role by either attending the deposition in person or in an “on 24 call” capacity as outlined in his e-mail dated July 30, 2011. Commissioner Best’s appearance 25 shall be determined at Defendants' discretion. 26 2. Commissioner Best shall have the authority and powers to: (1) rule on objects made 27 during the course of the depositions, (2) direct the witness to answer questions, and (3) rule on 28 motions and other requests by the parties relating to the scope of and conduct of the depositions. LAW OFFICES Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP 823291.01/SF -2- Case No. CIV-10-03461 CW PARTIES' STIP AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE APPOINTMENT OF DISCOVERY REFEREE 3. 1 Commissioner Best's rulings shall be compliant and consistent with Magistrate 2 Judge James' previous orders in this action, including her August 4, 2011, Discovery Order. 4. 3 Commissioner Best’s rulings: (1) are subject to appeal to Magistrate Judge James, 4 in the form of a joint letter, as set forth in Magistrate Judge James; Standing Order Regarding 5 Discovery & Dispute Procedures, but that any such appeal must be filed within 10 calendar days 6 following the ruling, and (2) must be in compliance with any previous orders of Magistrate Judge 7 James. 5. 8 Defendants will pay Commissioner Best’s fees and costs related to the performance 9 of his role as discovery referee, as set forth above. 10 IT IS SO STIPULATED THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD. 11 12 Dated: July 5, 2011 13 ALLEN MATKINS LECK GAMBLE MALLORY & NATSIS LLP By: /s/ Alexander Nestor ALEXANDER NESTOR Attorneys for Defendants WELLS FARGO BANK, WELLS FARGO & CO. AND PAM RUBIO 14 15 16 17 18 19 Dated: July 1, 2011 20 PERETZ & ASSOCIATES By: /s/ Yosef Peretz YOSEF PERETZ Attorneys for Plaintiffs YESENIA GUITRON and JUDI KLOSEK 21 22 23 /// 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// LAW OFFICES Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP 823291.01/SF -3- Case No. CIV-10-03461 CW PARTIES' STIP AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE APPOINTMENT OF DISCOVERY REFEREE 1 /// 2 /// ORDER 3 4 5 Pursuant to the parties' stipulation above, and good cause appearing therefor, IT IS SO 6 ORDERED. 7 8 9 September 29, 2011 DATED: ________________________ 10 ____________________________________ HON. MARIA-ELENA JAMES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 LAW OFFICES Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP 823291.01/SF -4- Case No. CIV-10-03461 CW PARTIES' STIP AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE APPOINTMENT OF DISCOVERY REFEREE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?