Stein v. ADM Careers, Inc. et al

Filing 12

STIPULATION AND ORDER RE 11 SELECTING ADR PROCESS, Case referred to early neutral evaluation.. Signed by Judge Beeler on 11/9/10. (lblc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/9/2010)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA MICHAEL STEIN, CASE NO. CV-10-3518 LB v ADM CAREERS,INC ,MICHAEL DUBNOFF,LARRY PETERSON, Defendant(s) STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS Counsel report that they have met and conferred regardlug ADR and have reached the following stipulation pursuant to C I V IL.R 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5. ~ The parties agree to participate in the follow~ng ADR process: Court Processes: Non-bmdmg Arb~trat~on b L R~4) ( J Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5) Mediation (ADR L.R. 6) (Note Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magutrate Judge I S appreciably more lzkely to meet thezr needs than any other form ofADR, mustpartrczpate in an ADR phone conference and may not file t h ~form They must insteadfile a Not~ce s ofNeed for ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L R. 3-5) Private Process: Private ADR @lease tdent13process andprowder) The partles agree to hold the ADR sesslon by the presumptive deadllne (The deadlrne is 90 daysfrom the date of the order J refemng the case to an ADR process unless othenvrse ordered.) other requested deadl~ne Dated. Dated: // - 7-16 I 1/6/13 UNIT ED S S DISTRICT TE C TA RT U O R NIA VED APPRO Judge L ER N F D IS T IC T O R A C LI 11/9/10 FO eeler aurel B NO RT H

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?